FOR
RELEASE:
|
|
|
Dec. 18,
2014
|
|
|
Assembly
Democratic Legislative Package to Reform NJ’s Expungement Laws Clears
Assembly
(TRENTON) – A two-bill legislative
package sponsored by Assembly Democrats Jerry Green, Grace L. Spencer, Reed
Gusciora, Gordon Johnson, John F. McKeon, Thomas Giblin, Benjie Wimberly,
Charles Mainor, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Annette Quijano, Gilbert “Whip” Wilson
and Cleopatra Tucker to reform New Jersey’s expungement laws was approved
Thursday by the Assembly.
The
first bill (A-206-471-1663-2879-3060-3108), sponsored
by Green, Spencer, Gusciora, Johnson, McKeon, Giblin, Wimberly, Mainor, Watson
Coleman and Quijano, would reduce the statutory waiting period for an
expungement from 10 years to five years from the date of the person’s last
conviction, payment of fine, satisfactory completion of probation or parole, or
release from incarceration, whichever is later, in the case of an indictable
offense. In the case of a disorderly persons or petty disorderly persons
offense, the waiting period would be reduced from five years to three
years.
“Expungement offers an incentive
against recidivism. It gives people who currently have little chance of finding
legal employment the opportunity to leave past mistakes behind them, find a job
and be productive,” said Green (D-Middlesex/Somerset/Union). “The fact of the
matter is, the system is working against those individuals who have served their
time and want to change and do better.”
“A
criminal record can affect a person’s ability to secure housing, employment and
even loans for school,” said Spencer (D-Essex). “How is a person supposed to
successfully reintegrate back into society when almost every road to
self-dependence is blocked by a criminal record?
“Individuals who have learned from
their mistakes should not be defined by their criminal records for the rest of
their lives,” said Gusciora (D-Mercer/Hunterdon). “These folks are going back
into our communities. It makes sense that we make it easier for them to become
constructive citizens.”
“Putting
your life back together after being incarcerated can take time. It can take even
longer with a criminal record looming over you,” said Johnson (D-Bergen). “It is
a greater benefit to society when these individuals are able to put their past
behind them and lead better, more productive lives.”
The bill
would also grant automatic expungement of the records of a criminal conviction
to certain persons who have completed a sentence to a term of special probation,
commonly referred to as drug court. The court would be permitted to order the
expungement of all records and information relating to all prior criminal
arrests, detention, convictions and proceedings, provided the person
satisfactorily completed a substance abuse treatment program as ordered by the
court and was not convicted of any crime, or adjudged a disorderly person or
petty disorderly person, during the term of special probation. An individual
would not be eligible for automatic expungement if the records include a
conviction for any offense barred from expungement under current
law.
“Participants in drug court have a
far lower recidivism rate than offenders who are incarcerated in state prisons,”
said McKeon (D-Essex/Morris). “If we want these individuals to continue on the
right path, then we have to give them the chance to do better instead of setting
up roadblocks.”
“There’s
no benefit to continually punish people who have served their time and now want
to redeem themselves,” said Giblin (D-Essex/Passaic). “We have to create
opportunities for individuals who want to be productive members of society,
which is very hard to do with a criminal record.”
“These
individuals successfully completed a substance abuse program. They did not break
any laws while in the program. They have demonstrated a desire to be and do
better,” said Wimberly (D-Bergen/Passaic). “Expunging their criminal records can
help them continue on the path to recovery.”
Lastly,
the bill would require the courts to order the expungement of all records and
information pertaining to an arrest or charge at the time of the dismissal,
acquittal or discharge. The bill would set forth certain procedural requirements
for a grant of automatic expungement and no fee would be charged. When an
expungement of an arrest or charge not resulting in conviction is not ordered by
the court, the individual would be allowed, at any time following the
disposition of the proceedings, to petition the courts for an expungement. The
bill would provide that an expungement related to dismissal, acquittal or
discharge would not bar any future expungement.
“It is
unfair to further penalize an individual who has been cleared of a crime,” said
Mainor (D-Hudson). “A criminal record can create barriers that make it difficult
to prosper. If a person is acquitted or their charges are dropped, then their
criminal record should be immediately expunged.”
“It is
difficult enough to find employment in the current economic climate. It becomes
that much harder with a criminal record,” said Watson Coleman
(D-Mercer/Hunterdon). “There is no reason why a criminal record against a person
who’s been cleared of wrongdoing should persist.”
“The
lingering effects of a criminal record can make the difference between
successful reintegration and reentry. These individuals went through the
judicial process and were absolved,” said Quijano (D-Union). “The sooner their
records are expunged, the sooner they can get back to normal.”
The
second bill (A-1815) would
establish the “Expungement Study Commission.” The commission would be tasked
with studying whether expungement of convictions should be automatic, without
the necessity for a petition to the Superior Court, and whether the expungement
of multiple offenses should be allowed, as well as any other related expungement
issues.
The
commission would include as part of its study an examination of the impact of a
criminal conviction on various aspects of life for a convicted persons
including, but not limited to, employment, licensing, housing and education. The
commission would be required to submit a final report within 18 months after
organizing to the governor and the Legislature. The commission would expire on
the 30th day after the final report is issued.
“Not
every criminal offender is destined to be a hardcore criminal,” said Wilson
(D-Camden/Gloucester). “If we are serious about rehabilitation and preventing
reentry into the prison system, then we must look at how we can better help
those individuals who want to start over.”
“Many
people who return to a life of crime blame their inability to find work due to
their criminal history,” said Tucker (D-Essex). “This may not apply to everyone
who has committed a crime, but for those who genuinely want to change their
lives around, it is worth looking into.”
“A
criminal record can haunt you for life,” said Wimberly. “If we want to help
people break the cycle, it makes sense to look into whether expungement should
be extended to multiple offenses, and whether it is feasible to automatically
expunge convictions after the relevant waiting periods are
over.”
The bill
(A-206-471-1663-2879-3060-3108) was approved 71-3-1, and the bill (A-1815) was
approved 68-0-0. Both bills now await further consideration by the
Senate.
No comments:
Post a Comment