Measure
Stems from Stratford, NJ Family’s Troubles Securing Kidney Transplant for
Disabled Three-Year-Old Daughter
(TRENTON) – Legislation Assembly
Democrats Valerie Vainieri Huttle, John J. Burzichelli, Troy Singleton and Craig
Coughlin sponsored to prohibit discrimination against organ transplant
candidates because of physical or mental handicaps was granted final legislative
approval by the full Assembly on Monday.
“Refusing to allow a viable candidate
for an organ transplant to receive one, simply because they have a preexisting
mental or physical disability that has no impact on their transplant suitability
should not be allowed to occur,” said Vainieri Huttle (D-Bergen), the Human
Services Committee Chair. “We wouldn’t allow discrimination based on race or
religion, and we shouldn’t allow it based on non-medically relevant
disabilities.”
The sponsors said their legislation
stems from an incident involving the Rivera family, from Stratford, NJ. The
Rivera’s three-year-old daughter, Amelia, who suffers from the developmental
disability Wolf-Hirschorn syndrome, was reportedly refused candidacy for a
kidney transplant by a doctor at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia due to
her disability, despite it not having any medical bearing on her eligibility as
a transplant candidate.
“It sickens me to think that a doctor
could look a mother and father in the eyes and tell them that their daughter
wasn’t eligible for an organ transplant because of a medically irrelevant mental
handicap,” said Burzichelli (D-Gloucester). “We need to make sure that this
type of discrimination doesn’t happen again.”
“Discrimination of any kind is
unconscionable, but discrimination in an organ transplant scenario literally
gives the bigotry life or death stakes,” said Singleton (D-Burlington). “No New
Jersey family should ever again have to experience the horrors and indignities
the Rivera family faced.”
Individuals with mental or physical
disabilities sometimes face discrimination in organ transplant scenarios because
of assumptions regarding their quality of life or their ability to comply with
complex post-transplant medical requirements, regardless of whether the
individual has an effective support system in place to ensure
compliance.
“This sort of discrimination is
simply mind-boggling,” said Coughlin (D-Middlesex). “One of the underlying
tenets of the Hippocratic Oath taken by doctors is to refrain from any
intentional injustice, but that’s exactly what was inflicted on little Amelia.
From her unfortunate lesson, we need to make sure this doesn’t happen
again.”
Under the bill (S-1456/A-2390) any
individual who is a candidate to receive an “anatomical gift,” or organ
transplant, would not be deemed ineligible solely based on a physical or mental
disability, provided the disability in question has been found by a physician or
surgeon to have no medically significant impact on the successful receipt of an
anatomical gift. If an individual has the necessary support system in place to
assist with complying with post-gift medical requirements, the individuals’
inability to independently comply with said requirements would not be deemed
medically significant. In all instances in the bill, the term “disability” has
the same meaning as in the federal “Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990.”
The measure was approved by a vote of
77-0 and now heads to the Governor’s desk.
No comments:
Post a Comment