(TRENTON) – The Assembly on Monday approved legislation sponsored by Assemblyman
Tim Eustace (D-Bergen) that would allow limited exemptions to local land use
restrictions when raising a structure to meet new federal flood elevation
standards would violate said restrictions.
“It is a catch-22 for
property owners. You want to raise your property to meet new federal guidelines
to protect your home from future flooding and avoid higher flood insurance
premiums, but doing so might mean breaking land use restrictions set by your
local government,” said Eustace. “The bill helps avoid this potential conflict
by providing a partial exemption that would allow the property owner to raise an
existing structure without violating local land use restrictions.”
The bill (A-3890) would
provide a person with a limited exemption from local land use restrictions when
raising a structure to meet a new Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
base flood elevation, if raising the structure would result in a violation of
local land use restrictions.
A “new FEMA base flood elevation” is
defined in the bill to mean any advisory base flood elevation or effective base
flood elevation proposed or adopted after October 29, 2012, by FEMA. A base
flood elevation, as calculated by FEMA, represents the elevation of a flood with
a one percent chance of occurrence during any given year, commonly referred to
as a “100-year flood.”
Specifically, the exemption would
allow a person to raise the structure to the “highest applicable flood elevation
standard,” which is defined in the bill to be the higher of two standards: (1)
the new Federal Emergency Management Agency base flood elevation plus two
additional feet, or (2) any applicable flood elevation standard required
pursuant to rules and regulations adopted by the Department of Environmental
Protection pursuant to the “Flood Hazard Area Control Act.”
The bill would not apply
to new construction. Also, the bill would provide that the exemption would not
be available to a person who has altered a structure under circumstances where,
had the alteration not been made, the structure could have been raised to meet
the highest applicable flood elevation standard either without the exemption or
with an exemption of lesser degree than what is needed with the alteration.
Nonetheless, a person would not be barred from qualifying for the exemption in
this manner because of any alteration that was initiated before the applicable
standard was publicly known, meaning, either the new FEMA base flood elevation
was publicly proposed by FEMA or the applicable flood elevation standard was
adopted by DEP, as the case may be.
The bill was approved
76-1-0 by the Assembly and awaits further consideration by the
Senate.
No comments:
Post a Comment