(TRENTON) – Legislation Assembly Democrats Vincent Prieto,
Bonnie Watson Coleman, Daniel R. Benson, Patrick J. Diegnan Jr. and Wayne
DeAngelo sponsored to require any bid to privatize the state lottery be subject
to approval of the state Legislature received final legislative approval when it
was approved 23-17 Monday by the Senate.
The bill (A-3614) comes as the Christie administration moves to
privatize lottery services, despite numerous questions about the plan and the
administration’s refusal to explain the plan to the public at Assembly Budget
Committee hearings on the issue.
“The proposal to privatize without public explanation one of our
most profitable and well-run assets is troubling,” said Prieto
(D-Hudson/Bergen), the Assembly budget chairman. “The Christie administration
appears ready to forfeit substantial long-term revenue for a one-shot payment
that will also hurt small business owners and risk vital programs for our
students, veterans and the disabled. More oversight is clearly needed.”
“Privatization
should be reserved for when the government cannot perform that function well on
its own,” said Watson Coleman (D-Mercer/Hunterdon). “Yet in this case, it
appears that the only one that stands to benefit from this proposal is the
company chosen to take over this asset. Legislative oversight is clearly
warranted.”
“This plan
raises many concerns when it comes to businesses, state oversight and even
access to children and teen-agers to online lottery playing,” said Benson
(D-Mercer/Middlesex). “As long as we don’t have these answers, then strict
oversight is required. More checks and balances is the smart thing to do for
taxpayers and economy.”
“Giving the lottery to a private vendor is like killing the
goose that laid the golden egg,” said Diegnan (D-Middlesex). “The Lottery
generates nearly $1 billion a year to fund education and senior programs. Also,
thousands of small business owners in the state rely on lottery sales as an
essential element of costumer sales. It’s difficult to rationalize privatization
under any circumstances, but it would be irresponsible to go forward with an
award when only was bid was submitted.”
“The
administration’s plan raises serious questions and requires checks and
balances,” said DeAngelo (D-Mercer/Middlesex). “Privatization wasn’t envisioned
when the current system was set up, so oversight to protect this valued program
and its benefits is paramount. We cannot put the Lottery and its benefits at
risk.”
The state established a lottery in
1970 to be operated by the state, with the entire net proceeds dedicated to
state institutions and state aid for education. Under current law, the state
Lottery Commission and the Division of State Lottery in the Department of the
Treasury administer the lottery in accordance with its constitutional and
statutory mission.
The bill would require that
a contract between the state and a private entity that provides for the
operation of the state Lottery by the private entity must be subject to the
approval of the members of the Senate and the General Assembly, by a majority
vote of such members in the form of a concurrent resolution.
Under the bill, such a contract would not be operative unless
thusly approved.
The bill was approved 45-29 by the Assembly in January. It now
goes to the governor.
No comments:
Post a Comment