Resolution Protects At-Risk Children; Gives
Administration 30 Days to Redo Report
(TRENTON) –
Legislation Assembly Democrats Bonnie Watson Coleman, Gary S. Schaer, Benjie E.
Wimberly and L. Grace Spencer sponsored rejecting Gov. Chris Christie’s proposed
school funding changes targeting at-risk, bilingual and special education
students was approved 47-30 Thursday by the Assembly.
The concurrent
resolution (ACR-172) notifies Christie that the Legislature objects to
recommendations included in his administration’s Educational Adequacy Report
that could sharply reduce funding for at-risk children. The overdue report was
finally delivered in December.
The report
recommended that the school funding law be modified to decrease the additional
weights for students who are at-risk, bilingual education students and those who
are both at-risk and bilingual education students.
“These careless
recommendations are not based on any research of the school funding level
necessary to achieve state standards, as required under the law or as expected
by the Supreme Court,” said Watson Coleman (D-Mercer/Hunterdon). “These
recommendations appear to be based more on conservative slash-and-burn ideology
than on academic findings. That’s completely unacceptable to Democrats who hold
dear our obligation to fight for a quality education for vulnerable
children.”
“These
recommendations are not supported by any research or analysis demonstrating the
school funding law has provided schools with more resources than required to
provide for the needs of these students,” said Schaer (D-Passaic/Bergen). “In
the absence of substantive analysis, the weights for at-risk and bilingual
children and the extraordinary special education aid thresholds should remain
the same as those established under the school funding law when enacted. We will
not let the governor blast away at the efforts to help our most at-risk children
succeed.”
“The current
law is designed to determine school funding based on extensive analysis of the
cost of delivering a quality education to all students, including low-income
students wherever they live in New Jersey, but these recommendations seem
designed solely to sharply reduce funding available to at-risk children,” said
Wimberly (D-Passaic/Bergen). “Saving money is vital, but this proposal seems
motivated by an ideological desire to slash without any regard to the
implications for at-risk children. That cannot be allowed to
stand.”
“The Democratic
Legislature is not going to stand for arbitrary funding cuts to at-risk
children,” said Spencer (D-Essex). “The Christie administration’s proposal
appears to be devoid of any necessary research and analysis, nor has the
department provided any type of summary of comments or recommendations provided
by those who helped put together this report. This report would not receive a
passing grade, so the administration must try again, this time keeping at-risk
children in mind.”
The concurrent
resolution – which requires no action by the governor - directs the Commissioner
of Education to submit a revised report to the Legislature that responds to
these objections no later than 30 days after a copy is transmitted to the
governor and the commissioner, or before the transmittal of the governor’s
budget message to the Legislature, whichever occurs first.
The measure
goes to the Senate for more consideration.
No comments:
Post a Comment