TRENTON) – New Jersey Assembly Speaker Sheila Y. Oliver had the following
published Thursday in The
Times of Trenton and www.politickernj.com
as the Assembly plans Thursday to vote on 22 gun violence prevention
bills:
“From
Colorado to Connecticut to a courthouse in Delaware, far too many lives have
been cut short by senseless gun violence.
“These
were the mass tragedies that grabbed headlines. But every day, on the streets
that wind their way all over America, even more innocent Americans fall victim
to a bullet. In 2011 alone, 269 New Jerseyans were killed by gun
violence.
“Today,
the New Jersey General Assembly will vote on a comprehensive package of roughly
two dozen bills aimed at curbing this epidemic.
“The
measures are a blend of temperance and temerity — the temperance necessary to
address the issue pragmatically without trampling on Second Amendment rights and
the temerity to tackle the issue once and for all instead of punting it to the
next tragedy.
The debate, thus far, has been passionate, to say the least.
The debate, thus far, has been passionate, to say the least.
“For those
who argue that our efforts are an emotional response to the tragedy at Sandy
Hook Elementary School, I don’t entirely disagree. To not be driven by emotion
to address the incomprehensible slaying of 20 innocent children would be
baffling.
“What this
is not, however, is a knee-jerk response. The time to get serious about
protecting our communities from gun violence is long overdue. Many of the
proposals Assembly Democrats have put forth are the result of long-running
discussions, expert advice and common-sense proposals to close glaring
loopholes.
“Limiting
ammunition magazines to no more than 10 rounds may help prevent would-be
shooters from gunning down half of the people in a movie theater. Taking guns
away from an individual deemed dangerous by a mental health professional may
help prevent a future college campus tragedy.
“Many of
the Assembly Democrats’ other proposals are designed, not to infringe on the
rights of law-abiding citizens, but to keep guns out of the hands of criminals
or those prone to violence due to severe mental health
issues.
“Requiring
government-issued photo identification cards to purchase a firearm is no more
unreasonable than requiring photo identification cards to drive an automobile,
especially since an automobile wasn’t designed with the intention to
kill.
“Another
proposal would prohibit anyone on the FBI’s Terrorist Watch List from obtaining
a gun permit. In case you were wondering, nearly 250 people on the terrorist
watch list bought guns in 2010 alone, according to the Government Accountability
Office.
“Still
other proposals would ban the sale of powerful, often battlefield-style, weapons
of .50 calibers or greater; establish gun-free zones around schools; prohibit
the sale of body armor-piercing bullets to protect law enforcement; require the
state to submit certain mental health records to the National Instant Criminal
Background Check System to help law-enforcement agencies nationwide conduct more
thorough gun background checks; require all state law-enforcement agencies to
report information relating to abandoned, discarded or seized illegal guns to
the National Crime Information Center to determine whether that firearm has been
reported stolen; and require ballistics tests to be conducted on such guns and
reported to the National Integrated Ballistic Identification Network to
determine if the firearm is associated with a crime.
“Our
comprehensive package promotes common-sense measures without infringing on the
Second Amendment rights enshrined in our Constitution. By keeping dangerous
weapons off of our streets, cracking down on illegal gun trafficking and
addressing mental health issues and school security, we can stop these tragedies
from becoming all too common.
“We cannot
expect to put an end to each and every gun crime, but we can responsibly close
the gaps and make our laws stronger. With the vast majority of Americans now
supporting stronger, smarter gun laws, it raises the question: If not now, then
when?
“When will
the cries of bereaved parents and the deafening silence on our playgrounds
finally tip the scales toward action rather than inertia? If we sit on our
hands, we will mourn not just the victims we have already lost, but the many
more who will inevitably follow.
“The
General Assembly will tilt the scales toward action today because, to borrow the
words of our president, ‘They deserve a vote.’ ”
No comments:
Post a Comment