After reading Tom Moran’s editorial column in the Star Ledger, it shows me that politics is local unless you pay attention to the issues that are not only going to affect the country, but also the state and local towns.
In case you have not had a chance to read his column, I am re-printing his column in its entirety. After reading his column, we cannot wait until next year but must start now in holding not only our Congressmen accountable, but all of our elected officials accountable. We cannot sit back and allow them to get a free ride.
So as Plainfield’s Democratic Chairman, I am not waiting until next year to get started in dealing with the issues that can cause this country and state hardships, because there are a handful of people have already made a decision, ‘my way or no way’. Their ‘way’ is not good for any middle income American which is why we need to begin to make our stand now.
I invite anyone who is interested in working with me to show our Congressman Frank Pallone Jr., and our President Barack Obama, that they have our total support. We are prepared now to speak out against those who are not standing up for what is good for ALL people.
If our opposition chooses to continue to play politics, we will draw our line in the sand and not wait until next year to put forward a movement. To have our country thrown into utter chaos is completely unacceptable.
Tom Moran Editorial
NJ Republicans in Congress have become Tea Party Foot Soldiers
As we watch the final days of this embarrassing dance with default, know that one thing is already settled: The Republicans won.
Neither of the two surviving plans raises taxes at all. The federal tax bite is now frozen at its lowest level in 60 years. And that means we are entering a new era of harsh austerity, with more than 14 million Americans already out of work.
This is radical stuff. So it’s been depressing to see New Jersey’s Republican members of Congress marching in formation without making a peep. These guys used to have a reputation as moderates, and now they are reduced to being foot soldiers of the tea party.
You would expect this from Rep. Scott Garrett (R-5th Dist.) because he has been doing crazy things for many years. He voted against relief for the victims of Hurricane Katrina, saying he was concerned some of the money would be wasted. Now that is small government.
But what about the rest of them? Once upon a time, this crew had an independent streak that fit New Jersey like a glove. Now, they seem to be channeling their colleagues from Texas.
Rep. Chris Smith (R-4th) is known mostly as an ardent opponent of abortion rights. But that misses a great deal. He is a principled human rights activists who bucked the Republican line on trade with China over its political persecutions. He has a pro-union voting record. And when he defied party leaders to defend veterans’ benefits in 2005, he lost his chairmanship of the Veterans Affairs Committee. He voted for the cap-and-trade bill to combat climate change. Now, he’s hiding in his office, turning down interview requests, and marching in formation when the small light in his office clock turns on, signaling that a vote is coming.
Rep. Frank LoBiondo (R-2nd) is another moderate who has been missing in action. Like Smith, he has a pro-labor voting record, and supported the last increase in the minimum wage. He gets solid scores from environmental groups, and voted for the cap-and-trade bill as well.
Rep. Leonard Lance (R-7th) is another case. His inspiring moment came in Trenton when he refused to support then-Gov. Christie Whitman’s pension bond deal, a move that so infuriated his Republican colleagues that he was removed as chairman of the state Senate Appropriations Committee. He also supported the cap-and-trade bill.
Lance, like LoBiondo, has cracked the door open to support ending some corporate tax breaks, including the ethanol subsidy. But for the most part, they are making no fuss as their party pushes this program.
Maybe they really believe this is the right approach. Lance and Garrett supported a budget plan that was even more extreme than the party leadership’s. Inspired by the tea party crowd, it would have savaged programs such as food stamps and health care for the poor and eliminated funding for the arts and public broadcasting, while cutting taxes on the rich.
But the political pressure to go along on the debt ceiling plan was crushing, so it’s hard to tell where their true sentiments lie.
“Both parties have made this a test of loyalty and strength,” says Stuart Rothenberg of the respected Rothenberg Report. “It happens a couple of times in a Congress, and this is one of them.”
It is true that some Democrats, including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California, are being as dogmatic as Republicans. But President Obama has made major compromises, and even the Senate Democratic plan contains no tax increases.
“I don’t think there’s any doubt that Democrats have given more ground than Republicans.”
That brings us to the final depressing point: Republicans now have Obama’s number. They’re going to win the next round, too. Because in a game of chicken like this, it always comes down to a question of who is more nuts.
Republicans made it clear that they would not lift the debt limit unless Democrats caved on taxes. That would have wrecked the economy, but they did seem ready to do it. And with that gun pointed to the hostage’s head, Obama decided to yield.
That is an ugly tactic. Too bad none of the Republicans from New Jersey stood up to object. It will be interesting to see how the state’s moderate voters react next November.
Friday, July 29, 2011
Barnes on Gov. Christie's Budget Cuts to Legal Services Programs
**MULTIMEDIA PACKAGE**
(Trenton) - Assembly Judiciary Committee Chairman Peter J. Barnes III (D-Middlesex) issued a multimedia package Thursday in which he discusses the impact the budget cuts Gov. Christie made to legal services for low-income New Jerseyans.
The multimedia package consists of a video of Assemblyman Barnes' comments and audio and a transcript of same.
The video can be accessed directly via our website - http://www.assemblydems.com/ - or by the following link: http://www.vimeo.com/27054561
A transcript of comments by Assemblyman Barnes is appended below:
Assemblyman Peter J. Barnes III (D-Middlesex), Assembly Judiciary Committee Chairman:
"Legal Services has always provided legal representation to those below the poverty line and, over the last three or four years, that group has grown substantially.
"The cuts in the budget were $10 million. And that $10 million cut really has had a devastating impact. The reduction in staff of lawyers and paralegals and support staff will mean that even more of our fellow citizens who are below the poverty line are not going to be represented.
"And so, if one party has a lawyer and the other doesn't, the one that doesn't is really at a tremendous disadvantage.
"The governor has shown some flexibility by reconsidering his line item vetoes in other areas of the budget. This is yet another category that we would respectfully ask him to reconsider."
Thursday, July 28, 2011
A Letter from Senate President Stephen Sweeney
Dear Friend,
As the weather heats up all across New Jersey, so too has the over-heated rhetoric of the Republicans running for the State Legislature. As we expected, this first glimpse of their playbook exposes their plan to try and hoodwink the voters with a campaign of innuendo, distortions and outright falsehoods.
I want to assure you that we're going to meet the Republican misinformation campaign head-on. We will challenge them in the newspapers, through the mail, on television and radio, and via the Internet. We know, however, that the best way to set the record straight is to bring the truth directly to you so you can tell your family, friends and neighbors when Chris Christie and the Republicans are trying to pull a fast one.
By following New Jersey's Democratic Legislative Majority on Twitter, you'll get information to challenge the GOP in real time. I also encourage you to follow the Democrats running for the State Senate and Assembly in your home district, share your thoughts and interact throughout the campaign with the men and women who want to represent you and your family in Trenton.
It's really no surprise that the Republicans are trying to deceive and otherwise manipulate the voters in an attempt to protect their positions in Trenton. Over the past 18 months, they have voted over and over again to increase rather than lessen the hardships on the middle class. They have slashed funding for programs for seniors while at the same time raising their property taxes; cut money to adequately fund our schools; decimated programs ensuring cancer screenings and other critical health-care services for thousands of women and children; and slashed spending for the disabled, veterans and others who are among the most vulnerable in our state. At the same time, they inexplicably voted to protect lucrative tax breaks for multimillionaires -- siding with the state's very wealthiest residents while turning their backs on the middle class.
As Democrats, we have different priorities: Yours. Over the last 18 months, we have waged a relentless fight against the Republicans across New Jersey as they have inflicted blow after blow against the vast majority of this state's residents. We are determined to continue fighting to make New Jersey more affordable, with a better quality of life, for everyone.
On August 1, there will be exactly 100 days until Election Day, when New Jersey voters will go to the polls to elect a new State Legislature. The choices will be very clear: Republicans who will rubber stamp Chris Christie every step of the way -- or Democrats who will stand up for the interests of you and your family.
Won't you please follow along?
Sincerely,
Senate President Stephen Sweeney
As the weather heats up all across New Jersey, so too has the over-heated rhetoric of the Republicans running for the State Legislature. As we expected, this first glimpse of their playbook exposes their plan to try and hoodwink the voters with a campaign of innuendo, distortions and outright falsehoods.
I want to assure you that we're going to meet the Republican misinformation campaign head-on. We will challenge them in the newspapers, through the mail, on television and radio, and via the Internet. We know, however, that the best way to set the record straight is to bring the truth directly to you so you can tell your family, friends and neighbors when Chris Christie and the Republicans are trying to pull a fast one.
By following New Jersey's Democratic Legislative Majority on Twitter, you'll get information to challenge the GOP in real time. I also encourage you to follow the Democrats running for the State Senate and Assembly in your home district, share your thoughts and interact throughout the campaign with the men and women who want to represent you and your family in Trenton.
It's really no surprise that the Republicans are trying to deceive and otherwise manipulate the voters in an attempt to protect their positions in Trenton. Over the past 18 months, they have voted over and over again to increase rather than lessen the hardships on the middle class. They have slashed funding for programs for seniors while at the same time raising their property taxes; cut money to adequately fund our schools; decimated programs ensuring cancer screenings and other critical health-care services for thousands of women and children; and slashed spending for the disabled, veterans and others who are among the most vulnerable in our state. At the same time, they inexplicably voted to protect lucrative tax breaks for multimillionaires -- siding with the state's very wealthiest residents while turning their backs on the middle class.
As Democrats, we have different priorities: Yours. Over the last 18 months, we have waged a relentless fight against the Republicans across New Jersey as they have inflicted blow after blow against the vast majority of this state's residents. We are determined to continue fighting to make New Jersey more affordable, with a better quality of life, for everyone.
On August 1, there will be exactly 100 days until Election Day, when New Jersey voters will go to the polls to elect a new State Legislature. The choices will be very clear: Republicans who will rubber stamp Chris Christie every step of the way -- or Democrats who will stand up for the interests of you and your family.
Won't you please follow along?
Sincerely,
Senate President Stephen Sweeney
Christie: Motor Vehicle Commission Fact Check
Gov. Christie reportedly claimed on Tuesday that the Legislature cut $35 million from the budget for MVC technology improvements, but here's a simple fact check.
The Democratic budget included $5.5 million in cuts to information technology, but nothing that the administration said was directly related to MVC computers.
A press release from the governor's office even stated that $5.5 million figure on July 13. It was sent out at 5:35 p.m. that day. Go back and check. (You won't find that release on the governor's website.)
Now please consider the following:
*In Christie's first year, FY 2011, the state spent almost $80 million less in total IT spending than it did the year before. So Christie is trying to blame others when in reality he did major damage in FY 2011.
*The MVC chief seemed quite pleased with the current state of information technology when he testified before the budget committee. See below:
"In speaking of the advancement of a technology investment such as the DARTSS system, I would be remiss if I didn't mention the major progress we've seen on our MATRX project, which is already in the second phase of a three-phase roll out. As we've noted in the past, this is a complete system overall that will provide improvement to every facet of motor vehicle services..."
And:
"Whether it's a new venture such as sports plates, security enhancement projects or technology and infrastructure investments, there have been a great amount of progress once again at the MVC, progress that we will take into the next fiscal year..."
And don't forget this:
*In the FY 2012 budget, more than $136 million in MVC revenue was raided for other use - $65 million more than in FY 2011.
*$85.8 million goes directly to the general fund.
*$20 million is transferred from the Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Fund to NJ Transit.
*$30.9 million is transferred from MVC revenues to a variety of other departments
*If the administration believes MVC has such a great need for IT funding, why didn't it let MVC keep more of its revenue instead of raiding almost twice as much as last year?
Perhaps the governor should spend more time trying to fix the MVC problem as head of the executive branch and less time blaming others with figures that cannot be supported.
The Democratic budget included $5.5 million in cuts to information technology, but nothing that the administration said was directly related to MVC computers.
A press release from the governor's office even stated that $5.5 million figure on July 13. It was sent out at 5:35 p.m. that day. Go back and check. (You won't find that release on the governor's website.)
Now please consider the following:
*In Christie's first year, FY 2011, the state spent almost $80 million less in total IT spending than it did the year before. So Christie is trying to blame others when in reality he did major damage in FY 2011.
*The MVC chief seemed quite pleased with the current state of information technology when he testified before the budget committee. See below:
"In speaking of the advancement of a technology investment such as the DARTSS system, I would be remiss if I didn't mention the major progress we've seen on our MATRX project, which is already in the second phase of a three-phase roll out. As we've noted in the past, this is a complete system overall that will provide improvement to every facet of motor vehicle services..."
And:
"Whether it's a new venture such as sports plates, security enhancement projects or technology and infrastructure investments, there have been a great amount of progress once again at the MVC, progress that we will take into the next fiscal year..."
And don't forget this:
*In the FY 2012 budget, more than $136 million in MVC revenue was raided for other use - $65 million more than in FY 2011.
*$85.8 million goes directly to the general fund.
*$20 million is transferred from the Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Fund to NJ Transit.
*$30.9 million is transferred from MVC revenues to a variety of other departments
*If the administration believes MVC has such a great need for IT funding, why didn't it let MVC keep more of its revenue instead of raiding almost twice as much as last year?
Perhaps the governor should spend more time trying to fix the MVC problem as head of the executive branch and less time blaming others with figures that cannot be supported.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
Greenwald: Christie's Cuts to Legal Service Put Vulnerable Residents at a Greater Disadvantage
(Trenton) - Assembly Budget Chairman Lou Greenwald (D-Camden) released the following statement Wednesday after hearing testimony on the impact of the governor's cuts to Legal Services of New Jersey and other legal assistance programs for the poor.
The governor cut $10 million from Legal Services of New Jersey. The governor also eliminated funding for clinical legal programs for the poor at Rutgers School of Law in Camden and in Newark.
Both programs lost $200,000 under the cuts:
"We heard from a gentleman from Camden today who said he's heard people talk about needing to turn to prayer in response to the governor's budget cuts and as they weighed the impact to legal services on their community. He is turn told them, "God doesn't need the money. Legal services do.'"
"I too am a big believer in prayer, but also in taking appropriation action."
"His story reminded me of the old joke about a man who seeks refuge on the roof of his house during a flood. He turns away a person in a canoe, a boat and then a helicopter, telling each that God is going to save them. At the pearly gates, he asks God why he didn't save them, and God tells him he sent help for him three times and he refused."
"The moral of the story is we must take action into our own hands, and we have done this with this budget that responsibly boosted funding for Legal Services and maintained funding for vital health clinics for the poor. It's unfortunate that the governor could not understand that, but perhaps after hearing today's testimony he will do the right thing and reconsider these cuts, as he has with others."
The governor cut $10 million from Legal Services of New Jersey. The governor also eliminated funding for clinical legal programs for the poor at Rutgers School of Law in Camden and in Newark.
Both programs lost $200,000 under the cuts:
"We heard from a gentleman from Camden today who said he's heard people talk about needing to turn to prayer in response to the governor's budget cuts and as they weighed the impact to legal services on their community. He is turn told them, "God doesn't need the money. Legal services do.'"
"I too am a big believer in prayer, but also in taking appropriation action."
"His story reminded me of the old joke about a man who seeks refuge on the roof of his house during a flood. He turns away a person in a canoe, a boat and then a helicopter, telling each that God is going to save them. At the pearly gates, he asks God why he didn't save them, and God tells him he sent help for him three times and he refused."
"The moral of the story is we must take action into our own hands, and we have done this with this budget that responsibly boosted funding for Legal Services and maintained funding for vital health clinics for the poor. It's unfortunate that the governor could not understand that, but perhaps after hearing today's testimony he will do the right thing and reconsider these cuts, as he has with others."
Barnes: Cuts to Legal Services a Blow for Working Class New Jerseyans
(Trenton) - Assembly Judiciary Chairman Peter J. Barnes III (D-Middlesex) released the following statement Wednesday after hearing testimony on the impact of the governor's cuts to Legal Services of New Jersey and other legal assistance programs for the poor.
The governor cut $10 million from Legal Services of New Jersey. The governor also eliminated funding for clinical legal programs for the poor at Rutgers School of Law in Camden and in Newark. Both programs lost $200,000 under the cuts:
"The governor's second significant funding cut in as many years to Legal Services of New Jersey - combined with the new cuts to the legal clinics - couldn't have come at worse time for working class New Jerseyans.
"This situation has unfortunately become a major concern, and it didn't have to be this way. Our responsible plan would have helped ease this crisis, but the governor not only cut the $5 million funding increase we approved for Legal Services, but cut another $5 million and then targeted the legal clinics for the poor in Camden and Newark.
"Our justice system rests upon the belief that each citizen deserves adequate representation in the courts, but the testimony we heard today shows many of our poorest residents won't have access to such representation as they fight concerns like foreclosure and domestic violence. That's not right.
"This is a matter of fairness. Cutting costs in these difficult economic times is a must, but we do so in a way that ensures all New Jerseyans receive justice. Everyone - not just New Jersey's wealthiest residents - should have access to proper legal representation.
"I will continue to work on a legislative solution, hopefully with cooperation from the governor, but the governor also needs to reconsider these cuts."
The governor cut $10 million from Legal Services of New Jersey. The governor also eliminated funding for clinical legal programs for the poor at Rutgers School of Law in Camden and in Newark. Both programs lost $200,000 under the cuts:
"The governor's second significant funding cut in as many years to Legal Services of New Jersey - combined with the new cuts to the legal clinics - couldn't have come at worse time for working class New Jerseyans.
"This situation has unfortunately become a major concern, and it didn't have to be this way. Our responsible plan would have helped ease this crisis, but the governor not only cut the $5 million funding increase we approved for Legal Services, but cut another $5 million and then targeted the legal clinics for the poor in Camden and Newark.
"Our justice system rests upon the belief that each citizen deserves adequate representation in the courts, but the testimony we heard today shows many of our poorest residents won't have access to such representation as they fight concerns like foreclosure and domestic violence. That's not right.
"This is a matter of fairness. Cutting costs in these difficult economic times is a must, but we do so in a way that ensures all New Jerseyans receive justice. Everyone - not just New Jersey's wealthiest residents - should have access to proper legal representation.
"I will continue to work on a legislative solution, hopefully with cooperation from the governor, but the governor also needs to reconsider these cuts."
Quigley: Christie Cuts Will Jeopardize Protection for Domestic Violence Victims
Assemblywoman Stresses Importance of Restoring Funding for Legal Services
(Trenton) - Assemblywoman Joan Quigley (D-Bergen/Hudson) on Wednesday stressed the importance of restoring funding for legal services to aid the poor after listening to testimony during the Assembly Judiciary Committee on how the Governor's cuts, in particular, will harm victims of domestic violence.
"In what appears to be a sad trend, the Governor's budget cuts fall disproportionately on the backs of women, particularly poorer women in this state," said Quigley. "When representatives from Legal Services of New Jersey say they may have to turn away 9 out of 10 domestic violence cases because of these cuts, it raises a serious red flag. Jeopardizing public safety to balance the budget, while allowing the state's wealthiest to scapegoat any sacrifice, is a sad commentary on the Governor's priorities."
Christie cut $10 million from Legal Services of New Jersey, which provides legal assistance to low-income New Jerseyans for their civil legal problems. This cut comes after the governor cut $9.7 million from the program in 2010, creating staff cutbacks and other concerns amid rising demand for legal services and increased poverty.
The governor also this year eliminated funding for clinical legal programs for the poor at Rutgers School of Law in Camden and in Newark. Both programs lost $200,000 under the cut.
"Legal Services of New Jersey provides immeasurable assistance to those who can't afford the means to protect themselves or combat legal injustices," added Quigley. "The Governor's cut to this program will make it extremely difficult to victims of domestic violence to get assistance in obtaining restraining orders and other vital services. As we've seen already, when the Governor is so inclined, he finds a way to restore funding to some of his more egregious cuts. This is one of those areas that should be given the same attention."
Coutinho, Greenwald Measure to Stimulate Job Creation & Development Investments Now Law
(Trenton) - A bill sponsored by Assemblymen Albert Coutinho and Louis Greenwald to help stimulate job creation and development investments in urban areas by expanding the eligibility requirements for various tax credits has been signed into law.
"Without solid incentives to invest in New Jersey, our economy will continue to stagnate," said Coutinho (D-Essex/Union). "This law will incentivize developers to invest in our communities that need it most and create jobs for residents who are dying to get back to work. This law is pro-worker, pro-business and pro-community. It's a win-win-win for everyone."
The new law enhances various programs created under the Economic Stimulus Act of 2009. The original law was sponsored by Coutinho and is considered to be the most aggressive investment incentive package in the nation at the time.
Currently, under the Urban Transit Hub Tax Credit Act (UTHTCA), a business may receive tax credits of up to 100 percent of its qualified capital investment in a business facility that is located in an urban transit hub, and employs at least 250 people at the facility. Annually, for ten years, the business may apply a credit equal to 10 percent of the amount of the investment against certain business-related state tax liability.
Under a separate but similar UTHTCA program, a developer may receive tax credits of up to 20 percent of its capital investment in a qualified residential project located in an urban transit hub.
Both business and residential projects are subject to the same $50 million project investment requirement in order to be eligible for the tax credits.
"This is about spurring investments in a shaky economy and putting people back to work," said Greenwald (D-Camden). "This law sends a message to investors that we are not going to sit idly by and pray for our economy to revive itself. Instead, we're providing the tools to make it happen."
The new law (S-2972/A-4161), however, will extend eligibility for these credits to participants in a mixed-use project comprising both a business facility and a residential development, neither of which by itself satisfies the total investment minimum of $50 million, so long as the investment in the component of the mixed use project for which the participant seeks credit amounts to at least $17.5 million, and the total amount invested in the project as a whole is at least $50 million. A project's business component must also employ 250 full-time employees to qualify.
The law changes the way credits under the UTHTCA are treated by eligible businesses by allowing companies receiving tax credits to carry forward allowable credits for up to 20 tax accounting periods and limits the value of the credit in any given year to $150 million.
The law also increases the size of the tax credit for residential UTHTCA projects from a maximum of 20 percent to 35 percent of the total capital investment in a qualifying project under the law.
The law also amends the "New Jersey Economic Stimulus Act of 2009" to expand the definition of a "qualifying economic redevelopment and growth grant incentive area" to include an area zoned for development pursuant to a master plan or subject to a redevelopment plan adopted by the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission and any land owned by the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority within the boundaries of the Hackensack Redevelopment and Growth (ERG) Grant program established by the act.
The ERG program is an incentive grant program that allows municipalities and/or the state to provide grant funding for redevelopment projects. The grant can be no more than 20 percent of the total cost of the redevelopment. The grant may provide up to 75 percent of the annual incremental state and/or local tax revenue for a period of up to 20 years.
"Without solid incentives to invest in New Jersey, our economy will continue to stagnate," said Coutinho (D-Essex/Union). "This law will incentivize developers to invest in our communities that need it most and create jobs for residents who are dying to get back to work. This law is pro-worker, pro-business and pro-community. It's a win-win-win for everyone."
The new law enhances various programs created under the Economic Stimulus Act of 2009. The original law was sponsored by Coutinho and is considered to be the most aggressive investment incentive package in the nation at the time.
Currently, under the Urban Transit Hub Tax Credit Act (UTHTCA), a business may receive tax credits of up to 100 percent of its qualified capital investment in a business facility that is located in an urban transit hub, and employs at least 250 people at the facility. Annually, for ten years, the business may apply a credit equal to 10 percent of the amount of the investment against certain business-related state tax liability.
Under a separate but similar UTHTCA program, a developer may receive tax credits of up to 20 percent of its capital investment in a qualified residential project located in an urban transit hub.
Both business and residential projects are subject to the same $50 million project investment requirement in order to be eligible for the tax credits.
"This is about spurring investments in a shaky economy and putting people back to work," said Greenwald (D-Camden). "This law sends a message to investors that we are not going to sit idly by and pray for our economy to revive itself. Instead, we're providing the tools to make it happen."
The new law (S-2972/A-4161), however, will extend eligibility for these credits to participants in a mixed-use project comprising both a business facility and a residential development, neither of which by itself satisfies the total investment minimum of $50 million, so long as the investment in the component of the mixed use project for which the participant seeks credit amounts to at least $17.5 million, and the total amount invested in the project as a whole is at least $50 million. A project's business component must also employ 250 full-time employees to qualify.
The law changes the way credits under the UTHTCA are treated by eligible businesses by allowing companies receiving tax credits to carry forward allowable credits for up to 20 tax accounting periods and limits the value of the credit in any given year to $150 million.
The law also increases the size of the tax credit for residential UTHTCA projects from a maximum of 20 percent to 35 percent of the total capital investment in a qualifying project under the law.
The law also amends the "New Jersey Economic Stimulus Act of 2009" to expand the definition of a "qualifying economic redevelopment and growth grant incentive area" to include an area zoned for development pursuant to a master plan or subject to a redevelopment plan adopted by the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission and any land owned by the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority within the boundaries of the Hackensack Redevelopment and Growth (ERG) Grant program established by the act.
The ERG program is an incentive grant program that allows municipalities and/or the state to provide grant funding for redevelopment projects. The grant can be no more than 20 percent of the total cost of the redevelopment. The grant may provide up to 75 percent of the annual incremental state and/or local tax revenue for a period of up to 20 years.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Unemployment Rises in NJ As Christie Campaigns for New Job in Iowa
(Trenton) - New Jersey State Democratic Chairman John Wisniewski released the following statement on Chris Christie's latest trip to raise his own national profile and campaign with conservative Congressman Steve King in Iowa:
"Chris Christie has become New Jersey's Sarah Palin, continuously traveling around the country to tell people that he's not interested in running for President," said Wisniewski. "Instead of staying to help New Jersey seniors and families struggling under budget cuts and rising unemployment, Christie decided to again raise his own national profile by campaigning out of the state in Iowa."
Politico reported that the campaign stop for Congressman Steve King was an effort to "return the favor" for King's help during a "rough 2009 congressional hearing."
"Today, Christie is trying to re-elect a Congressman who believes it is 'common sense' to engage in racial profiling and said that electing Barack Obama would have the terrorists 'dance in the streets.' This is just the latest example of how Chris Christie is out of touch with the values and struggles of New Jersey families. As our state sees unemployment continue to rise, Chris Christie runs away from our struggling workers to try and find himself a new job."
"Chris Christie has become New Jersey's Sarah Palin, continuously traveling around the country to tell people that he's not interested in running for President," said Wisniewski. "Instead of staying to help New Jersey seniors and families struggling under budget cuts and rising unemployment, Christie decided to again raise his own national profile by campaigning out of the state in Iowa."
Politico reported that the campaign stop for Congressman Steve King was an effort to "return the favor" for King's help during a "rough 2009 congressional hearing."
"Today, Christie is trying to re-elect a Congressman who believes it is 'common sense' to engage in racial profiling and said that electing Barack Obama would have the terrorists 'dance in the streets.' This is just the latest example of how Chris Christie is out of touch with the values and struggles of New Jersey families. As our state sees unemployment continue to rise, Chris Christie runs away from our struggling workers to try and find himself a new job."
Wisniewski on Marriage Equality: A Fundamental Civil Right
(Trenton) - New Jersey Democratic State Committee Chairman John Wisniewski released the following statement on Marriage Equality after Garden State Equality's rally in Hoboken today:
"Today is a great day for equal rights with Marriage equality becoming law across the river in New York," said Wisniewski. "As we have seen in New Jersey, the road to equality and inclusion is filled with roadblocks and detours. But setbacks don't mean that we stop traveling to reach our destination. This is a fundamental civil rights issue and while we have not yet reached our destination, we will not stop until we do."
"Today is a great day for equal rights with Marriage equality becoming law across the river in New York," said Wisniewski. "As we have seen in New Jersey, the road to equality and inclusion is filled with roadblocks and detours. But setbacks don't mean that we stop traveling to reach our destination. This is a fundamental civil rights issue and while we have not yet reached our destination, we will not stop until we do."
NJ Gov. Chris Christie's Record on Senior Citizens: Less Aid, Not More
Star Ledger Editorial, 7/24/2011
Gov. Chris Christie claims he's stood up for seniors, trumpeting his record last week from the kitchen table of an amiable 84-year old in Perth Amboy.
Time for a reality check. In many ways, seniors were better off before Christie took office. It's gotten only harder for people on fixed incomes to stay in their own homes, thanks to cuts Christie made to property tax relief programs for seniors and people with disabilities.
And if they wind up in nursing homes, they'll find fewer staffers to care for them, due to another $37 million cut made by Christie. The governor points our that he's increased funding for home care services, but that won't help this population.
Balancing the budget requires "shared sacrifice and tough decisions," the administration says. Unfortunately for seniors, a tax on millionaires wasn't one of them.
Christie still insists he's protecting seniors. He says he doubled benefits for the homestead rebate program, but declines to mention he did so after drastically slashing them last year. Christie cut the program from $1.1 billion in 2010 - the last year Gov. Jon Corzine was in office - to $268 million in 2011. He bumped it up to $458 million this year, but seniors are still getting less under Christie. That means a much smaller rebate check in the mail, even after Christie's recent increase.
Then there's the Senior Freeze. Christie claims credit for fully funding this rebate program, but let's not forget that he was the one who froze it last year, and again proposed freezing it this year. It was only thanks to the Democratic Legislature that the program was mostly restored.
Christie makes a similar claim about prescription drug assistance. We're glad he's fully funding these state programs, but again, he did so after initially proposing to raise co-pays on beneficiaries last year.
Taking credit for budget changes he was pressured into is quite different from prioritizing them himself. Seniors were never Christie's budget priority.
Gov. Chris Christie claims he's stood up for seniors, trumpeting his record last week from the kitchen table of an amiable 84-year old in Perth Amboy.
Time for a reality check. In many ways, seniors were better off before Christie took office. It's gotten only harder for people on fixed incomes to stay in their own homes, thanks to cuts Christie made to property tax relief programs for seniors and people with disabilities.
And if they wind up in nursing homes, they'll find fewer staffers to care for them, due to another $37 million cut made by Christie. The governor points our that he's increased funding for home care services, but that won't help this population.
Balancing the budget requires "shared sacrifice and tough decisions," the administration says. Unfortunately for seniors, a tax on millionaires wasn't one of them.
Christie still insists he's protecting seniors. He says he doubled benefits for the homestead rebate program, but declines to mention he did so after drastically slashing them last year. Christie cut the program from $1.1 billion in 2010 - the last year Gov. Jon Corzine was in office - to $268 million in 2011. He bumped it up to $458 million this year, but seniors are still getting less under Christie. That means a much smaller rebate check in the mail, even after Christie's recent increase.
Then there's the Senior Freeze. Christie claims credit for fully funding this rebate program, but let's not forget that he was the one who froze it last year, and again proposed freezing it this year. It was only thanks to the Democratic Legislature that the program was mostly restored.
Christie makes a similar claim about prescription drug assistance. We're glad he's fully funding these state programs, but again, he did so after initially proposing to raise co-pays on beneficiaries last year.
Taking credit for budget changes he was pressured into is quite different from prioritizing them himself. Seniors were never Christie's budget priority.
Conners, Tucker & Moriarty Bill Would Create Peer Support Program for Veterans
Trenton - Legislation Assembly Democrats Jack Conners, Cleopatra Tucker and Paul D. Moriarty sponsored to establish a veteran-to-veteran peer support telephone has received final legislative approval.
The bill (A-2616) would make permanent a program started by the Department of Military and Veterans' Affairs, in conjunction with the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. It was approved 78-0 by the Assembly and 36-0 by the Senate in late June and sent to the governor.
"The helpline is a great idea that receives and responds to calls from veterans, service members and their families," said Conners (D-Burlington/Camden), chairman of the Assembly Military and Veterans' Affairs Committee. "We sadly know all too well that many of our veterans need a helping hand once they've returned home, and hopefully a peer support program like this will encourage them to seek help when they need it."
"This program provides New Jersey veterans and their families with access to a comprehensive network of mental health professionals specializing in post traumatic stress disorder and other veterans issues," said Tucker (D-Essex). "It's a great program and we should ensure it's here to stay."
"The services are free and confidential, and since its inception, the helpline has fielded more than 6,000 calls," said Moriarty (D-Gloucester/Camden). "It's a valuable program that has already helped thousands of veterans in need after their service, and we need to make sure it continues to help veterans for years to come."
The bill (A-2616) would make permanent a program started by the Department of Military and Veterans' Affairs, in conjunction with the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. It was approved 78-0 by the Assembly and 36-0 by the Senate in late June and sent to the governor.
"The helpline is a great idea that receives and responds to calls from veterans, service members and their families," said Conners (D-Burlington/Camden), chairman of the Assembly Military and Veterans' Affairs Committee. "We sadly know all too well that many of our veterans need a helping hand once they've returned home, and hopefully a peer support program like this will encourage them to seek help when they need it."
"This program provides New Jersey veterans and their families with access to a comprehensive network of mental health professionals specializing in post traumatic stress disorder and other veterans issues," said Tucker (D-Essex). "It's a great program and we should ensure it's here to stay."
"The services are free and confidential, and since its inception, the helpline has fielded more than 6,000 calls," said Moriarty (D-Gloucester/Camden). "It's a valuable program that has already helped thousands of veterans in need after their service, and we need to make sure it continues to help veterans for years to come."
Assembly Panel to Consider Christie Cuts to Legal Services for Low-Income New Jerseyans
**WEDNESDAY ADVISORY**
Trenton - The Assembly Judiciary Committee will meet Wednesday to take testimony gauging the impact of the governor's cuts to Legal Services of New Jersey and other legal assistance programs for the poor.
The governor cut $10 million from Legal Services of New Jersey, which provides legal assistance to low-income New Jerseyans for their civil legal problems. This cut comes after the governor cut $8.7 million from the program in 2010, creating staff cutbacks and other concerns amid rising demand for legal services and increased poverty.
The governor also this year eliminated funding for clinical legal programs for the poor at Rutgers School of Law in Camden and in Newark. Both programs lost $200,000 under the cut.
"We need to weigh the impact of these of these cuts because, after all, this is a matter of fairness," said Assembly Judiciary Chairman Peter J. Barnes III (D-Middlesex). "We all must strive to save money in these difficult economic times, but we must to do so in a manner that ensures all New Jerseyans are in position to receive justice. Everyone - not just the wealthy - should have access to proper legal representation."
The hearing is set for Wednesday at 10 a.m. in Committee Room 12 on the 4th Floor of the State House Annex in Trenton. Audio of the hearing will be streamed live at: http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/media/live_audio.asp.
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Moriarty & Burzichelli Welcome Governor's Admission That Democratic Proposal to Restore Seniors Property Tax Relief Was Right Thing To Do
(Trenton) - Assemblymen Paul Moriarty and John Burzichelli on Thursday issued the following statement on Governor Christie's late-game admission that the democratically-led effort to restore property tax relief for seniors and disabled residents was the right thing to do.
"We fought hard to make sure that the Democratic budget we passed restored the cuts the Governor had made to the Senior Freeze property tax rebate program, knowing how hard it is for many seniors to get by in this climate," said Moriarty (D-Camden/Gloucester). "It's encouraging that the Governor now understands the plight of seniors on fixed incomes who are struggling to pay their property taxes."
The Governor initially proposed cutting the Senior Freeze program by $25.2 million this year (see page 68: www.state.nj.us/treasury/omb/publications/12bib/BIB.pdf). The final budget signed by the Governor increased Senior Freeze funding only after Democrats restored it via a resolution sponsored by Burzichelli and Moriarty. Today the Governor touted this accomplishment when meeting with seniors to discuss the importance of making property tax relief for them a priority in this year's budget.
"I'm getting a vague sense of deja vu here. Last year the governor proposed forcing seniors who receive prescription coverage through PAAD or Senior Gold to pay a sizable deductible, along with significant co-pays for name brand drugs," said Burzichelli (D-Salem/Cumberland/Gloucester). "It was only after the Democrats fought to eliminate these burdens that the Governor attempted to lay claim to these efforts. For the sake of the seniors, these moments of clarity are better late than never."
"We fought hard to make sure that the Democratic budget we passed restored the cuts the Governor had made to the Senior Freeze property tax rebate program, knowing how hard it is for many seniors to get by in this climate," said Moriarty (D-Camden/Gloucester). "It's encouraging that the Governor now understands the plight of seniors on fixed incomes who are struggling to pay their property taxes."
The Governor initially proposed cutting the Senior Freeze program by $25.2 million this year (see page 68: www.state.nj.us/treasury/omb/publications/12bib/BIB.pdf). The final budget signed by the Governor increased Senior Freeze funding only after Democrats restored it via a resolution sponsored by Burzichelli and Moriarty. Today the Governor touted this accomplishment when meeting with seniors to discuss the importance of making property tax relief for them a priority in this year's budget.
"I'm getting a vague sense of deja vu here. Last year the governor proposed forcing seniors who receive prescription coverage through PAAD or Senior Gold to pay a sizable deductible, along with significant co-pays for name brand drugs," said Burzichelli (D-Salem/Cumberland/Gloucester). "It was only after the Democrats fought to eliminate these burdens that the Governor attempted to lay claim to these efforts. For the sake of the seniors, these moments of clarity are better late than never."
Benson, Resolution Sponsor, Hails Property Tax Relief for Senior Citizens He Helped Restore
(Hamilton) - Assemblyman Dan Benson (D-Mercer/Middlesex) - who sponsored the budget resolution restoring money the governor sought to cut from the Senior Freeze property tax relief program - released the following statement Thursday on the governor's announcement that checks are in the mail:
"The governor's original budget proposal sought to cut the Senior Freeze program by $25 million, so, I'm thankful that under Democratic leadership our efforts to restore this money are finally paying off for New Jersey senior citizens."
"This program provides vital relief to senior citizens and residents with disabilities struggling to stay in their homes when faced with skyrocketing property taxes. The governor's budget cuts last year helped result in a $1 billion increase in property taxes statewide. Seniors and the disabled weren't going to be able to continue to absorb this type of increase, which is why I sponsored the resolution to restore this vital program with my Democratic colleagues.
"I'm glad to see the governor agreed, and I hope he can take that same cooperative approach to restoring money for nursing homes and specialty care nursing facilities, among other valuable services.
"Caring for seniors and disabled residents isn't about politics. It's about doing the right thing. Restoring the Senior Freeze program was the right thing and I'm very pleased to see the results of our effort."
"The governor's original budget proposal sought to cut the Senior Freeze program by $25 million, so, I'm thankful that under Democratic leadership our efforts to restore this money are finally paying off for New Jersey senior citizens."
"This program provides vital relief to senior citizens and residents with disabilities struggling to stay in their homes when faced with skyrocketing property taxes. The governor's budget cuts last year helped result in a $1 billion increase in property taxes statewide. Seniors and the disabled weren't going to be able to continue to absorb this type of increase, which is why I sponsored the resolution to restore this vital program with my Democratic colleagues.
"I'm glad to see the governor agreed, and I hope he can take that same cooperative approach to restoring money for nursing homes and specialty care nursing facilities, among other valuable services.
"Caring for seniors and disabled residents isn't about politics. It's about doing the right thing. Restoring the Senior Freeze program was the right thing and I'm very pleased to see the results of our effort."
Riley Calls on Assembly Republicans to Join Democrats in Appealing to Governor to Restore Funding for Nursing Homes & Specialty Care Units
(Trenton) - Assemblywoman Celeste Riley on Thursday echoed the sentiments of her colleague across the aisle, Assemblyman Joe Malone, and called on Republican legislators to join the Assembly Democrats in appealing to Governor Christie to restore vital cuts to nursing homes and specialty care facilities.
"This is an issue that touches all of our lives," said Riley (D-Salem/Cumberland/Gloucester). "I am moved by the testimony I heard today and trust that all of my colleagues are equally sensitive to the pleas of our elderly and those with special needs. Their safety and well-being is not something that should be sacrificed in order to balance the budget."
Riley took part in the Assembly Budget Committee hearing today which heard from a number of constituents, first hand, on the impact that Governor Christie's budget cuts are having on nursing homes and specialty care facilities.
The Democratic budget passed by the legislature had restored the $25 million that the Governor's original budget cut from nursing homes. However, through his line-item veto power, the Governor again removed the $25 million, a move that will now cost nursing homes $50 million because it triggers a loss in federal matching funds. The cut funding for Special Care Nursing Facilities by $4.652, which will impact 29 facilities, including four that serve children exclusively.
"Assemblyman Malone is confident that appealing directly to the Governor's Office is the most productive means for addressing this issue so I ask all of my colleagues to join me in appealing to the Governor for the restoration of these cuts so that seniors and the disabled can continue to remain in quality homes that afford them the best care," added Riley.
"This is an issue that touches all of our lives," said Riley (D-Salem/Cumberland/Gloucester). "I am moved by the testimony I heard today and trust that all of my colleagues are equally sensitive to the pleas of our elderly and those with special needs. Their safety and well-being is not something that should be sacrificed in order to balance the budget."
Riley took part in the Assembly Budget Committee hearing today which heard from a number of constituents, first hand, on the impact that Governor Christie's budget cuts are having on nursing homes and specialty care facilities.
The Democratic budget passed by the legislature had restored the $25 million that the Governor's original budget cut from nursing homes. However, through his line-item veto power, the Governor again removed the $25 million, a move that will now cost nursing homes $50 million because it triggers a loss in federal matching funds. The cut funding for Special Care Nursing Facilities by $4.652, which will impact 29 facilities, including four that serve children exclusively.
"Assemblyman Malone is confident that appealing directly to the Governor's Office is the most productive means for addressing this issue so I ask all of my colleagues to join me in appealing to the Governor for the restoration of these cuts so that seniors and the disabled can continue to remain in quality homes that afford them the best care," added Riley.
Fuentes Kicks Off Hispanic Leadership Summit in Recognition of Hispanic Heritage Month
**MONDAY ADVISORY**
(Trenton) - Assemblyman Angel Fuentes on Monday will announce the upcoming Hispanic Leadership Summit, which will kick off Hispanic Heritage Month and feature speakers and workshops geared to celebrate and empower New Jersey's largest minority group.
The press conference is set for 11 a.m. Monday, July 25 in Committee Room 109, 4th Floor, State House Annex in Trenton.
"Hispanics are the largest minority group in New Jersey and are on their way to becoming the largest minority group in American," said Fuentes (D-Camden/Gloucester). "This summit is recognition of their diversity, contributions and their potential. I'm calling on community, faith-based and business leaders, civic organizations, as well as elected officials from all levels of government to support and help us spread the word about the summit, which I hope will be the first of many."
Fuentes, who is co-chair of the Hispanic Leadership Summit, will be joined by Leeana Roman Lozada, president of Hispanics Impacting Public Policy (HIPP) at the press conference.
HIPP, a national non-partisan public policy organization dedicated to the promotion and betterment of the Hispanic community, is hosting the summit. For more information on the two-day summit, go to http://www.hipponline.com/.
As of July 1, 2009, according to the U.S. Census, Hispanic-owned businesses generated $345.2 billion in sales in 2007, up 55.5 percent compared with 2002. According to new census data, as of 2010, there are 1.5 million Hispanics in New Jersey. This makes up the largest minority group in the state, nearly 18% of the state's population.
Jasey Speaks at White House Summit, Will Now Work to Raise Awareness of Needs of Older Suburbs in Washington
(SOUTH ORANGE , NJ) – Just days after serving as a panelist in a White House summit about the challenges facing older suburbs, Assemblywoman Mila M. Jasey today announced she and other New Jersey representatives who attended the summit plan to work on a strategy to bring attention to the needs of New Jersey’s “first” or older suburbs to Washington.
Jasey (D-Essex) served as a panelist on the “Forum on First Suburbs, Inclusion, Sustainability and Economic Growth.” Jasey also chaired the summit’s New Jersey delegation.
Jasey and Maplewood Mayor Vic DeLuca, who also attended the summit, helped organize the New Jersey delegation to plan next steps. Janey and DeLuca were invited to participate by the New Jersey Regional Coalition (NJRC), one of the co-sponsors of the summit.
The summit, co-sponsored by and held at the White House on Monday, featured national experts who discussed the history of America's suburbs, home ownership and the growth of the middle class. The summit also emphasized their importance to the country’s future, and how investing in their infrastructure is vital to creating jobs and growing the economy, said Jasey.
“The White House made it clear it wants to hear from local leaders throughout the country about what we need and how they can support our efforts to promote inclusion, rebuild our first suburbs and grow jobs,” said Jasey. “I was energized and encouraged by the ideas and enthusiasm of people from Colorado, Indiana, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Arizona, Ohio, Maryland, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, New York, California and New Jersey. We are all facing similar challenges and can benefit from sharing ideas and solutions.”
Jasey said the New Jersey delegation at the summit met and shared information about challenges faced in their towns and schools, and the need for partnership to develop strategies to address those issues. “We talked about strength in numbers and the need to involve people at the local level to recognize and work on solutions that would be mutually beneficial,” she said.
Jasey said the delegation plans to meet in late August, along with other stakeholders who did not make the summit, to develop a strategy to engage as many of New Jersey’s first suburbs as possible, culminating in a statewide meeting involving the White House in early 2012.
Other topics covered at the summit were the migration of business out of the cities and the development of what are now referred to as the "inner ring" or "first suburbs", which are aging and require attention to their infrastructure, tax base and schools, said Jasey.
During her panel discussion, Jasey talked about “race and schools”, the challenges of addressing the academic achievement gap, the focus on "intentional integration" in the South Orange and Maplewood communities, working with the Community Coalition on Race and the need for state and federal policies that support their work.
“We are eliminating the achievement gap and would welcome the opportunity to be a model for other districts, especially if we can access grants to support our initiatives,” said Jasey.
Jasey was one of an exclusive group of 140 municipal, business and community leaders from around the country who have been invited to participate in the forum. The event was co-hosted by the White House, the New Jersey Regional Coalition and Building ONE America.
“Like Building ONE America and NJRC, I want to see policies that help older New Jersey suburbs, including a housing policy that increases economic diversity of wealthy towns to reduce pressure on places like South Orange, and full funding of a school funding formula that rewards older suburbs that are economically diverse,” said Jasey.
Jasey (D-Essex) served as a panelist on the “Forum on First Suburbs, Inclusion, Sustainability and Economic Growth.” Jasey also chaired the summit’s New Jersey delegation.
Jasey and Maplewood Mayor Vic DeLuca, who also attended the summit, helped organize the New Jersey delegation to plan next steps. Janey and DeLuca were invited to participate by the New Jersey Regional Coalition (NJRC), one of the co-sponsors of the summit.
The summit, co-sponsored by and held at the White House on Monday, featured national experts who discussed the history of America's suburbs, home ownership and the growth of the middle class. The summit also emphasized their importance to the country’s future, and how investing in their infrastructure is vital to creating jobs and growing the economy, said Jasey.
“The White House made it clear it wants to hear from local leaders throughout the country about what we need and how they can support our efforts to promote inclusion, rebuild our first suburbs and grow jobs,” said Jasey. “I was energized and encouraged by the ideas and enthusiasm of people from Colorado, Indiana, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Arizona, Ohio, Maryland, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, New York, California and New Jersey. We are all facing similar challenges and can benefit from sharing ideas and solutions.”
Jasey said the New Jersey delegation at the summit met and shared information about challenges faced in their towns and schools, and the need for partnership to develop strategies to address those issues. “We talked about strength in numbers and the need to involve people at the local level to recognize and work on solutions that would be mutually beneficial,” she said.
Jasey said the delegation plans to meet in late August, along with other stakeholders who did not make the summit, to develop a strategy to engage as many of New Jersey’s first suburbs as possible, culminating in a statewide meeting involving the White House in early 2012.
Other topics covered at the summit were the migration of business out of the cities and the development of what are now referred to as the "inner ring" or "first suburbs", which are aging and require attention to their infrastructure, tax base and schools, said Jasey.
During her panel discussion, Jasey talked about “race and schools”, the challenges of addressing the academic achievement gap, the focus on "intentional integration" in the South Orange and Maplewood communities, working with the Community Coalition on Race and the need for state and federal policies that support their work.
“We are eliminating the achievement gap and would welcome the opportunity to be a model for other districts, especially if we can access grants to support our initiatives,” said Jasey.
Jasey was one of an exclusive group of 140 municipal, business and community leaders from around the country who have been invited to participate in the forum. The event was co-hosted by the White House, the New Jersey Regional Coalition and Building ONE America.
“Like Building ONE America and NJRC, I want to see policies that help older New Jersey suburbs, including a housing policy that increases economic diversity of wealthy towns to reduce pressure on places like South Orange, and full funding of a school funding formula that rewards older suburbs that are economically diverse,” said Jasey.
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Vainieri Huttle Calls on Legislature to Work Together to Address Christie Cuts to NJ After 3
Bergen Assemblywoman Concerned About Impact Funding Loss Will Have on Englewood
(Trenton) - After a lengthy Assembly panel hearing on Tuesday examining the impact of Governor Christie's budget vetoes on children, Assemblywoman Valerie Vainieri Huttle (D-Bergen) underscored the need to address the Governor's $3 million cut in funding for the NJ After 3 program, a decision that is poised to impact children and parents in Englewood.
"The NJ After 3 program has had demonstrable success in achieving positive outcomes for students," said Vainieri Huttle. "The Governor's veto means the Englewood program, alone, is losing $100,000 to help serve 160 kids ages 4 to 9. For many parents, this may mean the difference in whether they can afford to send their child to a productive environment after school each day."
The funding equates to roughly $600 per student for the 10 months of after school care provided each year. Currently, parents are already paying between $65-110 per month for this care, depending on their income.
"Once the effect of the Governor's cut is felt, parents may have to pay double for this program, roughly anywhere between $125-200 per month," added Vainieri Huttle. "According to Bergen Family Services, which runs the program, most parents may not be able to cobble that kind of money together and will likely end up pulling their kids out of the program. Englewood is considered an at-risk district and it does have a notable gang presence. For many children, the NJ After 3 Program may literally help decide their very future."
Vainieri Huttle noted that an independent 3-year evaluation by Public Study Associates demonstrated that the program is a cost-effective public/private partnership that improves students' academic performance. The study showed that students who participated in the program for at least two years demonstrated statistically significant gains in language arts skills and those who were highly active in the program demonstrated significantly higher scores in study skills than those that were less active.
"This type of success cannot be ignored. It behooves all of us, Democrats and Republicans alike, to work together to ensure that the program does not have to absorb a substantial cut for the second year in a row," concluded Vainieri Huttle.
Vainieri Huttle noted that in 2011, the Governor proposed the elimination of the entire $10 million for NJ After 3. In the final budget that was passed, the Legislature was about to restore $3 million to the program. However, the substantial cut in funding impacted thousands of New Jersey children and their families who are struggling in the current economy.
The Governor, once again this year, proposed elimination of the entire appropriation for this program. Democrats restored the funding in the budget they passed in late June, only to have it excised through the Governor's line-item veto.
Assembly Panel to Consider Christie Cuts to Senior Citizens
**Thursday Advisory**
(Trenton) - The Assembly Budget Committee will meet Thursday to hear testimony on Gov. Chris Christie's cuts to senior citizen programs.
The hearing is scheduled for 10:00 a.m., Thursday, July 21, in Committee Room 11 on the 4th Floor of the State House Annex in Trenton.
Audio of the hearing will be streamed at: www.njleg.state.nj.us/media/live_audio.asp
Christie:
*Cut $25 million from nursing homes;
*Cut $4.65 million from specialty care nursing facilities;
*Line-item vetoed $13 million to protect Medicaid and Medicare patients from higher co-payments and to ensure they have access to drugs not included in Medicare; and
*Line-item vetoed $11 million to keep the aged, blind and disabled population out of managed care.
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Gusciora Statement on Approval of NJ's Medical Marijuana Program
(Trenton) - Assemblyman Reed Gusciora (D-Mercer), a prime sponsor of New Jersey's Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act, issued the following statement in response to Governor Christie's announcement today that New Jersey will begin implementation of its medical marijuana program:
"The long-awaited green light for New Jersey's medical marijuana program marks a monumental day for people in New Jersey who have been patiently awaiting relief.
"Roughly a year and a half after the Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act was signed into law by Governor Corzine, we are now seeing it being put into action. With six operating, stand-alone dispensaries dispersed among the regions, we are affording people greater access to the care that they need in their time of pain.
"As the sponsor of the original bill, I had hoped for some of the restrictions to be lifted. However, as I said all along, I would rather we address these issues over the long-term so that we can get the program up and running as quickly as possible. I am confident that other aspects of the law, like the THC strength, will be continually evaluated throughout the process by the Department of Health and Human Services and I look forward to hearing their findings down the road," said Gusciora.
"The long-awaited green light for New Jersey's medical marijuana program marks a monumental day for people in New Jersey who have been patiently awaiting relief.
"Roughly a year and a half after the Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act was signed into law by Governor Corzine, we are now seeing it being put into action. With six operating, stand-alone dispensaries dispersed among the regions, we are affording people greater access to the care that they need in their time of pain.
"As the sponsor of the original bill, I had hoped for some of the restrictions to be lifted. However, as I said all along, I would rather we address these issues over the long-term so that we can get the program up and running as quickly as possible. I am confident that other aspects of the law, like the THC strength, will be continually evaluated throughout the process by the Department of Health and Human Services and I look forward to hearing their findings down the road," said Gusciora.
Assembly Democrats: Testimony Shows Cuts to Children's Programs Put Futures at Risk
(Trenton) - Assembly Democrats released the following statements Tuesday after hearing testimony on Gov. Chris Christie's cuts to programs that serve children:
Assembly Budget Chairman Lou Greenwald (D-Camden):
"The testimony we heard today makes very clear that these inexplicable cuts to programs crucial to the well-being of New Jerseyans most vulnerable children are irresponsible both fiscally and morally. We're committed to working to resolve the crisis facing many of these caring organizations, and remain hopeful everyone will work cooperatively toward that goal."
Assembly Human Services Chairwoman Valerie Vainieri Huttle (D-Bergen):
"Budgets are a reflection of priorities, and after hearing this testimony I continue to be very sorry to see that New Jersey's most vulnerable children are not everyone's priority. This isn't about politics. This is about New Jersey's abused, sick, disabled and poor children who deserve better and we've got to find a way to help ease some of these cuts."
Assemblywoman Nellie Pou (D-Passaic/Bergen):
"For many blind children in our state and those suffering from developmental disabilities, the state services they receive have been a saving grace. In addition to the testimony we heard today, I've talked to many parents who have said that without these programs, their children might never reach their full potential. We cannot turn our backs on the needs of some of our most vulnerable children."
Assemblywoman Joan Quigley (D-Hudson/Bergen):
"What this hearing proved is that the vetoes do, indeed, have real life consequences. These programs have been a proven success and an oasis for children subjected to some of the most unimaginable horrors and difficulties. When Republicans claim no one is really hurt by this budget, they are sorely mistaken, and I hope all will now work together to resolve these cuts."
Assemblyman John Burzichelli (D-Gloucester/Salem/Cumberland):
"For years now, the court-appointed special advocates, services for the blind and the NJ After 3 program, among others, have proven to be a powerful intervention system, leading many children down a productive path in life. What we learned today is that the veto of the funding for these programs means the future of these children is now less clear and at risk. We need to do better."
Assemblyman Albert Coutinho (D-Essex):
"These cuts punish parents for having to work, and children for having adversities they struggle to overcome. We need to work together to find a way to repair the damage caused by these cuts and allow New Jersey's most vulnerable children to get the services they need."
Assemblywoman Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-Mercer):
"There's no justification for cutting funding to programs whose sole purpose is to help children affected by disabilities, abuse and poverty. These children have enough to endure without these vetoes making their journey that more difficult, and we all need to work cooperatively to find solutions."
Assemblywoman Elease Evans (D-Passaic/Bergen):
"Are we as a state willing to cut funding for programs that assist abused children and children with disabilities? Surely not. That does not represent our core value. We must all see that these programs continue to provide the services these children need."
Assembly Budget Chairman Lou Greenwald (D-Camden):
"The testimony we heard today makes very clear that these inexplicable cuts to programs crucial to the well-being of New Jerseyans most vulnerable children are irresponsible both fiscally and morally. We're committed to working to resolve the crisis facing many of these caring organizations, and remain hopeful everyone will work cooperatively toward that goal."
Assembly Human Services Chairwoman Valerie Vainieri Huttle (D-Bergen):
"Budgets are a reflection of priorities, and after hearing this testimony I continue to be very sorry to see that New Jersey's most vulnerable children are not everyone's priority. This isn't about politics. This is about New Jersey's abused, sick, disabled and poor children who deserve better and we've got to find a way to help ease some of these cuts."
Assemblywoman Nellie Pou (D-Passaic/Bergen):
"For many blind children in our state and those suffering from developmental disabilities, the state services they receive have been a saving grace. In addition to the testimony we heard today, I've talked to many parents who have said that without these programs, their children might never reach their full potential. We cannot turn our backs on the needs of some of our most vulnerable children."
Assemblywoman Joan Quigley (D-Hudson/Bergen):
"What this hearing proved is that the vetoes do, indeed, have real life consequences. These programs have been a proven success and an oasis for children subjected to some of the most unimaginable horrors and difficulties. When Republicans claim no one is really hurt by this budget, they are sorely mistaken, and I hope all will now work together to resolve these cuts."
Assemblyman John Burzichelli (D-Gloucester/Salem/Cumberland):
"For years now, the court-appointed special advocates, services for the blind and the NJ After 3 program, among others, have proven to be a powerful intervention system, leading many children down a productive path in life. What we learned today is that the veto of the funding for these programs means the future of these children is now less clear and at risk. We need to do better."
Assemblyman Albert Coutinho (D-Essex):
"These cuts punish parents for having to work, and children for having adversities they struggle to overcome. We need to work together to find a way to repair the damage caused by these cuts and allow New Jersey's most vulnerable children to get the services they need."
Assemblywoman Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-Mercer):
"There's no justification for cutting funding to programs whose sole purpose is to help children affected by disabilities, abuse and poverty. These children have enough to endure without these vetoes making their journey that more difficult, and we all need to work cooperatively to find solutions."
Assemblywoman Elease Evans (D-Passaic/Bergen):
"Are we as a state willing to cut funding for programs that assist abused children and children with disabilities? Surely not. That does not represent our core value. We must all see that these programs continue to provide the services these children need."
Speaker Oliver Statement on Transitional Aid
(Trenton) - Assembly Speaker Sheila Y. Oliver (D-Essex/Passaic) released the following statement on Monday:
"Assembly leadership is of course willing to review the governor's proposal, but we also will want to see the money go directly to cities, not into building a new layer of bureaucracy that obliterates local autonomy.
"Despite the governor's rhetoric, the DCA has always retained oversight authority. Language providing for oversight remained untouched in the budget. In fact, I've made clear that fiscal accountability is always a priority, though these cities that are under constant fiscal stress need a level of independence to decide how best to serve residents.
"The simple fact is the governor should have never cut this money.
"At the very least it's good to see the governor moving toward correcting one of his many errors that put working class New Jerseyans at risk."
"Assembly leadership is of course willing to review the governor's proposal, but we also will want to see the money go directly to cities, not into building a new layer of bureaucracy that obliterates local autonomy.
"Despite the governor's rhetoric, the DCA has always retained oversight authority. Language providing for oversight remained untouched in the budget. In fact, I've made clear that fiscal accountability is always a priority, though these cities that are under constant fiscal stress need a level of independence to decide how best to serve residents.
"The simple fact is the governor should have never cut this money.
"At the very least it's good to see the governor moving toward correcting one of his many errors that put working class New Jerseyans at risk."
Vainieri Huttle Proposes Legislation Requiring Oversight, Protection for Home-Schooled Children
Measure Prompted by Lack of Accountability Revealed in the Wake of the Tragic Death of 8-Year Old Irvington Girl
(Trenton) - Assembly Human Services Committee Chair Valerie Vainieri Huttle (D-Bergen) today announced that she is putting forth legislation to regulate the home schooling of children in light of an investigation recently conducted by the state Department of Children and Families (DCF) into the tragic death of eight-year old Christiana Glenn of Irvington.
The legislation, prompted by the lack of home schooling oversight revealed in DCF's investigation, would require medical examinations and submission of student work portfolios for home-schooled children and prohibit children under the supervision of the Division of Youth and Family Services from being home-schooled.
"The tragic death of Christiana Glenn affirms the need for a reasonable home-schooling law in New Jersey," said Vainieri Huttle. "I applaud the dedicated parents who home-school their children, but there must be a system of accountability. New Jersey has a legal responsibility to provide all of its youth with a 'thorough and efficient education.' The only way the state will know if it is meeting that obligation is to account for students who receive an alternative education at home."
The legislation was prompted by information recently received from the state Department of Children and Families (DCF) as a follow-up to questions raised during a June hearing held by Vainieri Huttle's Assembly committee.
In a letter received on Friday, DCF Commissioner Allison Blake detailed the review that took place following little Christiana's death and outlined a series of recommendations for improvement, including the need for DCF to coordinate with the state Department of Education (DOE) to fully understand the requirements of home schooling in New Jersey to determine if the development of policies and protocols is warranted to increase child safety.
After researching the matter, Vainieri Huttle noted that the state has little-to-no requirements for home schooled children, particularly when it comes to accountability and oversight. Most notably, parents are not required to notify school districts of their intention to home school a child; the board of education does not have to approve the child's home school curriculum; and a parent does not have to be certified.
"Not only does this pose serious concerns as to the level of education being received by these children, but it also eliminates the protection and oversight provided by school personnel," added Vainieri Huttle. "Many cases of child abuse are ofter first detected by teachers and school staff who are used to being around these children on a daily basis. Unfortunately, little Christiana did not have the watchful eyes of school staff to help detect the abuse to which she was being subjected."
The bill would also require the parent of a home-schooled child to provide certain information to the resident school district each school year, including documentation by September 1 of each year verifying that the child has undergone an annual medical examination.
The bill would also mandate that any child under the care, custody or supervision of the Division of Youth and Family Services, including a child placed in a resource family home or in a kinship care home, may not be home-schooled unless the child's home-schooling is approved by the division.
Under the bill, the parent would also be required to submit a letter by August 1 of each school year informing the district superintendent of the decision to home-school the child for that school year.
The letter must include the name and date of birth of the child, and the name of the person who will provide instruction to the child. The parent must also submit to the resident school district by June 30 of each school year a portfolio of student records and materials used to assess the reading, writing, and computational skills of a student.
Vainieri Huttle intends to introduce the legislation the next time the Assembly is in session.
Monday, July 18, 2011
Quigley: Continued Insensitivity By Governor's Office Another Sign of Panic on Budget Cuts
(Trenton) - Assemblywoman Joan M. Quigley (D-Hudson/Bergen) released the following statement Monday after the Christie administration called upcoming hearings on the impact of the governor's budget cuts to children and senior citizens "a waste of New Jersey taxpayers' time and money."
Hearings are set for both Tuesday and Thursday. Tuesday's hearing on cuts to children's programs will be held at 10 a.m. in Committee Room 11 on the 4th floor of the State House Annex in Trenton:
"It's not surprising that this governor's office considers testimony on cuts to vulnerable children and senior citizens to be a waste, but that doesn't make its continued insensitivity any less disturbing. It's very disappointing that the lieutenant governor would join in on such let-them-eat-cake rhetoric.
"How does holding a public hearing on brutal cuts to children and seniors amount to a waste of time and money? Is it because the lights in the committee room might have been off if we weren't there? Or is it the wear and tear on the microphones? Dirt on the carpets?
"Of course not.
"Clearly, this governor's office is panicking and doesn't want the public to see who these cuts are directly hurting. What does it consider a valid use of taxpayer money? Hiring someone to post on Twitter? Blowing education grant applications?
"These hearings will gauge the impact of unprecedented cuts to children and senior citizens, among others, to see what, if anything, can be done to repair the damage. Public debate is what democracy is all about, and the governor's office should welcome it. I at least hope my legislative Republican colleagues will finally reject the Christie administration's rhetoric and join with us cooperatively to properly examine these cuts."
Hearings are set for both Tuesday and Thursday. Tuesday's hearing on cuts to children's programs will be held at 10 a.m. in Committee Room 11 on the 4th floor of the State House Annex in Trenton:
"It's not surprising that this governor's office considers testimony on cuts to vulnerable children and senior citizens to be a waste, but that doesn't make its continued insensitivity any less disturbing. It's very disappointing that the lieutenant governor would join in on such let-them-eat-cake rhetoric.
"How does holding a public hearing on brutal cuts to children and seniors amount to a waste of time and money? Is it because the lights in the committee room might have been off if we weren't there? Or is it the wear and tear on the microphones? Dirt on the carpets?
"Of course not.
"Clearly, this governor's office is panicking and doesn't want the public to see who these cuts are directly hurting. What does it consider a valid use of taxpayer money? Hiring someone to post on Twitter? Blowing education grant applications?
"These hearings will gauge the impact of unprecedented cuts to children and senior citizens, among others, to see what, if anything, can be done to repair the damage. Public debate is what democracy is all about, and the governor's office should welcome it. I at least hope my legislative Republican colleagues will finally reject the Christie administration's rhetoric and join with us cooperatively to properly examine these cuts."
Assembly Panel to Consider Christie Cuts to Senior Citizens
**Thursday Advisory**
(Trenton) - In what will be the second hearing examining the impact of the governor's budget cuts, the Assembly Budget Committee will meet Thursday to hear testimony on Gov. Chris Christie's cuts to senior citizens.
The hearing is scheduled for 10:00 a.m., Thursday, July 21, in Committee Room 11 on the 4th Floor of the State House Annex in Trenton.
Audio of the hearing will be streamed live at: www.njleg.state.nj.us/media/live_audio.asp
Christie, among other moves, cut $25 million from nursing homes and $4.65 million from specialty care nursing facilities when he used his line-item veto on the Democratic budget plan.
The committee's first meeting on the cuts will take place at 10 a.m. on Tuesday to hear the impact of Christie's cuts to children's programs.
"Our focus must be on how Gov. Christie's cuts are further hurting our middle-class and poor, children, senior citizens and most vulnerable residents," Assembly Speaker Sheila Y. Oliver (D-Essex/Passaic) has said.
"Working class New Jersey deserves no less than reasonable discussion and a responsible response," Assembly Majority Leader Joseph Cryan (D-Union) has said.
Friday, July 15, 2011
Caputo to Introduce Most Stringent Version of Caylee's Law in New Jersey
Bill Would Require Police to be Notified of a Missing Child Within 12 Hours
(Belleview) - Assemblyman Ralph Caputo (D-Essex) on Thursday announced he is introducing the most stringent New Jersey measure, to date, to help law enforcement deal with missing children's cases in the wake of the missteps that were revealed during the Casey Anthony trial.
"Any law enforcement authority will tell you that the first few hours after a child goes missing are the most critical in determining whether that child is found and unharmed," said Caputo. "Sometimes parents, whether good or ill intentioned, might wait longer than that to contact authorities, increasing the chances of a tragic ending."
Unlike other measures that have been introduced recently requiring authorities to be notified within 24 hours, Caputo's bill would give only a 12-hour window for a person to report a missing child to police. Anyone who fails to do so would be guilty of a crime of the fourth degree, which is punishable by up to 18 months in prison, a fine up to $10,000, or both.
"This timeframe might not have affected the outcome in the tragic case of Caylee Anthony, but at the very least it might have aided authorities in recovering her body more quickly and determining the cause of her death in order to bring some justice to this poor little girl," added Caputo.
Known as Caylee's law, Caputo intends to introduce the bill the next time the Assembly is in session.
(Belleview) - Assemblyman Ralph Caputo (D-Essex) on Thursday announced he is introducing the most stringent New Jersey measure, to date, to help law enforcement deal with missing children's cases in the wake of the missteps that were revealed during the Casey Anthony trial.
"Any law enforcement authority will tell you that the first few hours after a child goes missing are the most critical in determining whether that child is found and unharmed," said Caputo. "Sometimes parents, whether good or ill intentioned, might wait longer than that to contact authorities, increasing the chances of a tragic ending."
Unlike other measures that have been introduced recently requiring authorities to be notified within 24 hours, Caputo's bill would give only a 12-hour window for a person to report a missing child to police. Anyone who fails to do so would be guilty of a crime of the fourth degree, which is punishable by up to 18 months in prison, a fine up to $10,000, or both.
"This timeframe might not have affected the outcome in the tragic case of Caylee Anthony, but at the very least it might have aided authorities in recovering her body more quickly and determining the cause of her death in order to bring some justice to this poor little girl," added Caputo.
Known as Caylee's law, Caputo intends to introduce the bill the next time the Assembly is in session.
Johnson, Coughlin & Conners Look to Help Families of N.J. Soldiers on Active Duty
(Trenton) - Legislation Assembly Democrats Gordon Johnson, Craig J. Coughlin and Jack Conners sponsored to promote donations to a fund that helps the families of New Jersey soldiers called into active duty recently received final legislative approval.
The bill (A-2286) would establish the New Jersey National Guard State Family Readiness Council Fund and provide for a spot on the state's gross income tax return to permit taxpayers to make voluntary contributions to the fund.
It was approved 77-0-1 by the Assembly in March and 38-0 by the Senate in June. It now goes to the Governor.
"These families are heroes," said Johnson (D-Bergen). "They too have sacrificed to defend our freedom, coping while a loved one ships out to faraway places and providing crucial support to our soldiers, even as they struggle financially with lost income and increased stress. The least we can do is offer them our support, too."
"I am confident that New Jerseyans will be generous enough to donate a few dollars here and there to help families," said Coughlin (D-Middlesex). "This bill would make it easy to do just that, and that's a good thing for everyone involved."
"The fund would provide support to members of the New Jersey National Guard and their families," said Conners (D-Burlington/Camden). "This support is intended to help members and their families cope during difficult times when a wage-earner has temporarily left civilian employment to be placed on active military duty. The council provides education, counseling and financial planning so the spouses of deployed Guard members have what they need to cope."
The bill (A-2286) would establish the New Jersey National Guard State Family Readiness Council Fund and provide for a spot on the state's gross income tax return to permit taxpayers to make voluntary contributions to the fund.
It was approved 77-0-1 by the Assembly in March and 38-0 by the Senate in June. It now goes to the Governor.
"These families are heroes," said Johnson (D-Bergen). "They too have sacrificed to defend our freedom, coping while a loved one ships out to faraway places and providing crucial support to our soldiers, even as they struggle financially with lost income and increased stress. The least we can do is offer them our support, too."
"I am confident that New Jerseyans will be generous enough to donate a few dollars here and there to help families," said Coughlin (D-Middlesex). "This bill would make it easy to do just that, and that's a good thing for everyone involved."
"The fund would provide support to members of the New Jersey National Guard and their families," said Conners (D-Burlington/Camden). "This support is intended to help members and their families cope during difficult times when a wage-earner has temporarily left civilian employment to be placed on active military duty. The council provides education, counseling and financial planning so the spouses of deployed Guard members have what they need to cope."
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Albano & Gusciora Bill to Promote Fish & Wildlife Management Continues Advancing
(Trenton) - Legislation Assembly Democrats Nelson Albano and Reed Gusciora sponsored to promote voluntary donations to help New Jersey fish and wildlife conservation management was recently approved 78-0 by the Assembly.
The bill (A-4039) establishes the "Fish and Wildlife Conservation Management Fund" and provides for a designation on the state gross income tax return that will permit taxpayers to make voluntary contributions to help support efforts and initiatives administered by the Division of Fish and Wildlife in the Department of Environmental Protection.
"New Jersey's economy relies heavily on a healthy environment, tourism and proper conservation management," said Albano (D-Atlantic/Cape May/Cumberland). "Our heritage as the Garden State will erode if we don't do more to manage fish and wildlife conservation, and I'm confident New Jerseyans agree. With this bill, they'll be able to help out if they choose to do so."
"We need strong fish and wildlife conservation if we're going to build a strong future for our state," said Gusciora (D-Mercer). "New Jerseyans know that communities from Cape May to Mercer County to Bergen County rely on a strong environment, and I think they'd be more willing to help that effort. This bill simply aims to make that help easier to give."
The bill has now been referred to Senate Environment and Energy Committee.
The bill (A-4039) establishes the "Fish and Wildlife Conservation Management Fund" and provides for a designation on the state gross income tax return that will permit taxpayers to make voluntary contributions to help support efforts and initiatives administered by the Division of Fish and Wildlife in the Department of Environmental Protection.
"New Jersey's economy relies heavily on a healthy environment, tourism and proper conservation management," said Albano (D-Atlantic/Cape May/Cumberland). "Our heritage as the Garden State will erode if we don't do more to manage fish and wildlife conservation, and I'm confident New Jerseyans agree. With this bill, they'll be able to help out if they choose to do so."
"We need strong fish and wildlife conservation if we're going to build a strong future for our state," said Gusciora (D-Mercer). "New Jerseyans know that communities from Cape May to Mercer County to Bergen County rely on a strong environment, and I think they'd be more willing to help that effort. This bill simply aims to make that help easier to give."
The bill has now been referred to Senate Environment and Energy Committee.
Congressional Redistricting By The Numbers
New Jersey's Congressional redistricting effort presents the highest of stakes for one U.S. Representative this year as the state is slated to lose one member of the delegation, dropping the representation to 12.
Speculation is rampant over which congressman is in the most danger of losing his seat and who might be safe when the game of musical chairs stops in January. The current makeup is seven Democrats and six Republicans so the chances of an agreement that all sides can live with are scarce, sources tell PolickerNJ.
The commission has not yet met as a whole and the deadline for the new maop is still six months away, but interviews with sources on both sides of the aisle as well as census numbers released earlier this year hold clues as to how each side may proceed once the 13th member of the commission is named. The tie-breaking member could be named as early as Friday but will more likely be chosen by the Supreme Court next month.
Every district in the state needs to add residents to conform to the ideal population size of 732,658. Since the districts were drawn 10 years ago, District 4, which has been represented by Republican U.S. Rep Chris Smith for more than two decades, has grown the most, followed by District 12, which is represented by U.S. Rep. Rush Holt (D-12). Both cover the central portion of the state.
The process promises to be parochial as members will no doubt lobby to save their own seats while also trying to boost their respective parties in Washington, D.C.
Republicans familiar with the thinking of the GOP team say their focus will likely be on the Northeastern portion of the state, where Democratic U.S. Reps. Albio Sires, (D-13), Donald Payne, (D-10), Steve Rothman, (D-9), and Bill Pascrell (D-8) control portions of Essex, Passaic, Hudson, Bergen and Union counties.
GOP sources say the cluster of four districts presents the most obvious place to consolidate. District 13 needs to add 47,000 residents without upsetting the demographic mix, while District 10 needs an additional 98,000 residents, roughly half of them black. One way to do that, Republican sources say, is to raid Districts 8 and 9. But cherry-picking those districts, which each need roughly 72,000 additional residents to bring them up to the ideal size of 732,658, would create havoc elsewhere, Republican sources say, leaving a combination of the two the most favorable outcome for the GOP.
The argument is strengthened, they say, by census data that show that area of the state has not grown as fast as portions farther south. Payne's District has lost residents since it was drawn, while Districts 8 and 9 have grown more slowly than any of the remaining 10 districts. Another GOP school of thought has Republicans targeting U.S. Rep. Frank Pallone, (D-6), who as one source said, "hasn't made any friends in the delegation."
Democrats have a different take, according to two sources connected tothe Congressional delegation. One Democratic map, sources say, would combine Districts 5 and 11 and pit U.S. reps. Rodney Frelinghuysen, (R-11), and Schoot Garrett, (R-5), in a Republican primary. The thinking goes that New Jersey is a blue state so the delegation should reflect a Democratic majority. Combining those districts would allow Districts 8 and 9 to move north into Bergen County and potentially south into Union to gain the needed population.
One Democratic source said Democrats could focus on any of the three Western New Jersey districts, including some combination that includes the 7th, represented by Republican Leonard Lance.
But all sources say a compromise between the two sides could feature a combination of the 12th and the 7th Districts, which would pit Holt against Lance. Lance is serving only his second term in the seat and is the second most junior member of the delegation behind freshman Rep. Jon Runyan.
What's more, Lance's hometown of Clinton Township abuts the 12th District, making the map less destructive to the remaining 11 districts. Democrats say that district should remain one that favors Holt in order to reflect the state's blue leanings.
A second so-called compromise map that has been discussed is one that would pit Pascrell and Frelinghuysen in a combined district, which Democrats say should be on that votes about 55 percent Democratic, again to reflect the state's leftward tilt.
But any speculation at this stage of the game is just that, warned one attorney connected tothe Democratic team, and does not reflect the thinking of the commission.
Bill Castner, who is serving as a counsel to the Democratic team, cautioned that it's still too early in the process to make any predictions. The commission, he said, has not even looked at any maps to date.
"It's not very wise to forecast map strategy or outcomes at this stage, primarily because the independent member of the Commission has yet to be named, hearings have not been held, and the deadline is not until mid-January," he said. "It's phrenology at this point. One lession, though, from state redistricting, is that it is very very risky for either side to overreach."
The members of the commission from both sides of the aisle must vote on a 13th member by Friday. If they cannot agree, the names of the two highest vote getters will be forwarded to the state Supreme Court, which has until Aug. 10 to choose between the two.
By Darryl R. Isherwood
Speculation is rampant over which congressman is in the most danger of losing his seat and who might be safe when the game of musical chairs stops in January. The current makeup is seven Democrats and six Republicans so the chances of an agreement that all sides can live with are scarce, sources tell PolickerNJ.
The commission has not yet met as a whole and the deadline for the new maop is still six months away, but interviews with sources on both sides of the aisle as well as census numbers released earlier this year hold clues as to how each side may proceed once the 13th member of the commission is named. The tie-breaking member could be named as early as Friday but will more likely be chosen by the Supreme Court next month.
Every district in the state needs to add residents to conform to the ideal population size of 732,658. Since the districts were drawn 10 years ago, District 4, which has been represented by Republican U.S. Rep Chris Smith for more than two decades, has grown the most, followed by District 12, which is represented by U.S. Rep. Rush Holt (D-12). Both cover the central portion of the state.
The process promises to be parochial as members will no doubt lobby to save their own seats while also trying to boost their respective parties in Washington, D.C.
Republicans familiar with the thinking of the GOP team say their focus will likely be on the Northeastern portion of the state, where Democratic U.S. Reps. Albio Sires, (D-13), Donald Payne, (D-10), Steve Rothman, (D-9), and Bill Pascrell (D-8) control portions of Essex, Passaic, Hudson, Bergen and Union counties.
GOP sources say the cluster of four districts presents the most obvious place to consolidate. District 13 needs to add 47,000 residents without upsetting the demographic mix, while District 10 needs an additional 98,000 residents, roughly half of them black. One way to do that, Republican sources say, is to raid Districts 8 and 9. But cherry-picking those districts, which each need roughly 72,000 additional residents to bring them up to the ideal size of 732,658, would create havoc elsewhere, Republican sources say, leaving a combination of the two the most favorable outcome for the GOP.
The argument is strengthened, they say, by census data that show that area of the state has not grown as fast as portions farther south. Payne's District has lost residents since it was drawn, while Districts 8 and 9 have grown more slowly than any of the remaining 10 districts. Another GOP school of thought has Republicans targeting U.S. Rep. Frank Pallone, (D-6), who as one source said, "hasn't made any friends in the delegation."
Democrats have a different take, according to two sources connected tothe Congressional delegation. One Democratic map, sources say, would combine Districts 5 and 11 and pit U.S. reps. Rodney Frelinghuysen, (R-11), and Schoot Garrett, (R-5), in a Republican primary. The thinking goes that New Jersey is a blue state so the delegation should reflect a Democratic majority. Combining those districts would allow Districts 8 and 9 to move north into Bergen County and potentially south into Union to gain the needed population.
One Democratic source said Democrats could focus on any of the three Western New Jersey districts, including some combination that includes the 7th, represented by Republican Leonard Lance.
But all sources say a compromise between the two sides could feature a combination of the 12th and the 7th Districts, which would pit Holt against Lance. Lance is serving only his second term in the seat and is the second most junior member of the delegation behind freshman Rep. Jon Runyan.
What's more, Lance's hometown of Clinton Township abuts the 12th District, making the map less destructive to the remaining 11 districts. Democrats say that district should remain one that favors Holt in order to reflect the state's blue leanings.
A second so-called compromise map that has been discussed is one that would pit Pascrell and Frelinghuysen in a combined district, which Democrats say should be on that votes about 55 percent Democratic, again to reflect the state's leftward tilt.
But any speculation at this stage of the game is just that, warned one attorney connected tothe Democratic team, and does not reflect the thinking of the commission.
Bill Castner, who is serving as a counsel to the Democratic team, cautioned that it's still too early in the process to make any predictions. The commission, he said, has not even looked at any maps to date.
"It's not very wise to forecast map strategy or outcomes at this stage, primarily because the independent member of the Commission has yet to be named, hearings have not been held, and the deadline is not until mid-January," he said. "It's phrenology at this point. One lession, though, from state redistricting, is that it is very very risky for either side to overreach."
The members of the commission from both sides of the aisle must vote on a 13th member by Friday. If they cannot agree, the names of the two highest vote getters will be forwarded to the state Supreme Court, which has until Aug. 10 to choose between the two.
By Darryl R. Isherwood
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Mental Health Association in New Jersey Event
Walk for Wellness
Make Plans to Join us this Year!
Date: Sunday, October 9, 2011
(rain or shine)
Pre-registration: $20 per walker minimum
Registration day of the Walk: $25 per walker minimum
Check-in: 8:30 am
Start Time: 10:00 am
Location: Johnson Park, Piscataway, NJ
Walk Distance: 5K (3.1 miles)
After the Walk: Party to the sounds of the Shore Blues Band
This is a family fun event!
The registration fee is not required for children under 13 and dogs of any age.
************************************************
Dear Friend,
Join us for our 4th Annual "Walk for Wellness" and show your commitment to the importance of promoting emotional well-being for ALL New Jerseyans!
Registration includes free breakfast and lunch, a "Walk for Wellness" T-shirt and tickets for the post walk raffle.
We cordially invite you to get involved.
Print this flyer and post it in as many places as you can think of...for example, where you get your morning coffee, your gym, your favorite restaurant, your church, temple, or mosque, your agency, business, or self help center.
Be a walker: Sign up and get financial sponsorship from family, friends, colleagues. Print the Walk for Wellness Contributor's Sheet or log on to our 2011 MHANJ Walk for Wellness website to create a personal Walk for Wellness Donor Page.
Here are some great tips about how to ask for a contribution:
Sponsor a walker: Make a financial pledge to support a walker. Log on to 2011 MHANJ Walk for Wellness website to search for your donor or visit their personal Walk for Wellness Donation Page.
Build a walking team: Sign up your friends and family to walk and get their own contributors. If you like, you can walk under your own banner. Print the Walk for Wellness Team Registration Form or log on to 2011 MHANJ Walk for Wellness website to register and build your team. Here's some great information about how to build your team!
Volunteer: If you can't walk, we can use your help the day of the event. Come be part of the excitement! Contact Bob Martin, Director of Development at (973) 571-4100, ext. 128 or rmartin@mhanj.org.
Be a business sponsor: Support the walk by making a financial donation, sponsoring a mental health fact sign, or donating goods and services for our raffle the day of the walk. Contact Bob Martin, Director of Development at (973) 571-4100, ext. 128 or rmartin@mhanj.org.
Be part of Information Alley: Set up a table and let walkers know about your goods or services. Contact Bob Martin, Director of Development at (973) 571-4100, ext. 128 or rmartin@mhanj.org.
Thank you, in advance, for supporting MHANJ's efforts to improve the lives of people who have mental illness and their family members.
Sincerely,
Carolyn Beauchamp, ACSW
President and CEO
Dedicated to promoting good mental health for all New Jerseyans, reducing the barriers that prevent too many people from seeking or offering help and support, and building a stronger base of support and network of services for people with mental health challenges.
Wagner: Shoddy MVC Service Under Christie Unacceptable
(Paramus) - Assemblywomen Connie Wagner (D-Bergen) released the following statement Wednesday on continued shoddy customer service by the Motor Vehicle Commission under Gov. Chris Christie:
"It's appalling that Gov. Christie has taken one of the remarkable success stories in recent New Jersey government history and essentially trashed it in 18 months.
"Motorists across this state had become accustomed to brutal waits at motor vehicle agencies, until the reforms of decade ago changed that reality. Now, motor vehicle agencies are again a mess under Gov. Christie.
"That mess was made very clear by Monday's computer crash that inconvenienced numerous New Jerseyans and brought motor vehicle agencies to a standstill.
"What was the point of closing the agencies on Monday to save $4 million if the result was going to be lost wages for New Jersey workers forced to stand in line for hours? And that's if they're lucky and the computers don't crash on them, forcing them to come back for another wait.
"It's clear enough the governor doesn't care about working class residents and their time, but maybe he should consider the economic impact of the lost wages incurred standing in line these days at motor vehicle offices."
"It's appalling that Gov. Christie has taken one of the remarkable success stories in recent New Jersey government history and essentially trashed it in 18 months.
"Motorists across this state had become accustomed to brutal waits at motor vehicle agencies, until the reforms of decade ago changed that reality. Now, motor vehicle agencies are again a mess under Gov. Christie.
"That mess was made very clear by Monday's computer crash that inconvenienced numerous New Jerseyans and brought motor vehicle agencies to a standstill.
"What was the point of closing the agencies on Monday to save $4 million if the result was going to be lost wages for New Jersey workers forced to stand in line for hours? And that's if they're lucky and the computers don't crash on them, forcing them to come back for another wait.
"It's clear enough the governor doesn't care about working class residents and their time, but maybe he should consider the economic impact of the lost wages incurred standing in line these days at motor vehicle offices."
Assembly Panel to Meet July 19th to Examine Gov. Christie's Cuts to Programs that Serve Children
(Trenton) - As part of the Assembly's effort to examine the negative impact of Gov. Chris Christie's cuts to New Jersey's middle-class and poor, the Assembly Budget Committee will meet next Tuesday to hear testimony on the governor's cuts to programs that serve children.
"Gov. Christie's cuts hit working class New Jerseyans hard across the board, but his cuts to vital programs for children are among the harshest anyone have ever seen," said Assembly Budget Chairman Lou Greenwald (D-Camden). "The impact of these cuts demand immediate attention, and we're committed to trying to find a way to make sure these programs continue to serve children suffering through horrific cases of abuse, illness, and poverty."
"The governor's budget was a reflection of his priorities, and I'm sorry to see New Jersey's most vulnerable children are not on that list," said Assembly Human Services Chairwoman Valerie Vainieri Huttle (D-Bergen), who will join the panel for the hearing. "Residents throughout our state are reeling from the governor's cuts, but these children especially have no means to fend for themselves. Abused, sick, disabled and poor children deserve better and we've got to find a way to help."
The governor:
"We're not talking about political hacks here," Oliver said. "We're not talking about pork spending. We're not talking about special interests. We're talking about abused children. We're talking about traumatized children. We're talking about protecting and healing the most innocent amongst us. Many of the governor's cuts are heartless, but this is inexplicable. This is sickening."
"This cut by the governor shows a callous indifference to the plight of some of our most vulnerable," said Spencer. "This center has been a beacon of hope for thousands of children who have been subjected to unimaginable horrors. I don't blame the governor for refusing to defend his cuts because many, like this one, are indefensible."
The Tuesday, July 19 hearing will be held at 10 a.m. in Conference Room 11 on the 4th floor of the State House Annex in Trenton.
"Gov. Christie's cuts hit working class New Jerseyans hard across the board, but his cuts to vital programs for children are among the harshest anyone have ever seen," said Assembly Budget Chairman Lou Greenwald (D-Camden). "The impact of these cuts demand immediate attention, and we're committed to trying to find a way to make sure these programs continue to serve children suffering through horrific cases of abuse, illness, and poverty."
"The governor's budget was a reflection of his priorities, and I'm sorry to see New Jersey's most vulnerable children are not on that list," said Assembly Human Services Chairwoman Valerie Vainieri Huttle (D-Bergen), who will join the panel for the hearing. "Residents throughout our state are reeling from the governor's cuts, but these children especially have no means to fend for themselves. Abused, sick, disabled and poor children deserve better and we've got to find a way to help."
The governor:
- Eliminated $537,000 for Wynona M. Lipman Child Advocacy Center, which serves abused children.
- Chopped $5 million from child behavioral health services.
- Sliced $7.9 million from the early childhood intervention program that helps children with developmental disabilities.
- Cut $1.5 million for teachers for children who are blind and visually impaired.
- Eliminated $3 million for the successful NJ After 3 child care program for working parents.
- Eliminated language designed to improve services for Head Start programs in suburban and rural school districts.
"We're not talking about political hacks here," Oliver said. "We're not talking about pork spending. We're not talking about special interests. We're talking about abused children. We're talking about traumatized children. We're talking about protecting and healing the most innocent amongst us. Many of the governor's cuts are heartless, but this is inexplicable. This is sickening."
"This cut by the governor shows a callous indifference to the plight of some of our most vulnerable," said Spencer. "This center has been a beacon of hope for thousands of children who have been subjected to unimaginable horrors. I don't blame the governor for refusing to defend his cuts because many, like this one, are indefensible."
The Tuesday, July 19 hearing will be held at 10 a.m. in Conference Room 11 on the 4th floor of the State House Annex in Trenton.
DeAngelo Bill to Boost Awareness of Senior Citizen Prescription Drug Program Continues Advancing
(Trenton) - Legislation sponsored by Assemblyman Wayne P. DeAngelo to help boost enrollment in New Jersey's Senior Gold prescription drug program recently received final legislative approval.
The bill (A-2632) would require the Department of Treasury to prominently display eligibility qualifications for and benefits available under the Senior Gold program in the income tax instructions it makes available annually to taxpayers.
"Anything we can do to promote this program to senior citizens who may not be aware it's available is a good thing," said DeAngelo (D-Mercer/Middlesex). "Seniors struggle daily to pay for their medication, but this program can be a big help, and with this bill, we'll be making a real effort to let everyone know it's out there."
The Senior Gold Prescription Discount Program is a state-funded prescription program. Senior citizens are eligible if they are:
The bill was approved 78-0 by the Assembly in October and 39-0 by the Senate in June. It now goes to the Governor.
The bill (A-2632) would require the Department of Treasury to prominently display eligibility qualifications for and benefits available under the Senior Gold program in the income tax instructions it makes available annually to taxpayers.
"Anything we can do to promote this program to senior citizens who may not be aware it's available is a good thing," said DeAngelo (D-Mercer/Middlesex). "Seniors struggle daily to pay for their medication, but this program can be a big help, and with this bill, we'll be making a real effort to let everyone know it's out there."
The Senior Gold Prescription Discount Program is a state-funded prescription program. Senior citizens are eligible if they are:
- A New Jersey resident;
- 65 years of age or older or 18 years of age or older and receiving Social Security Title II Disability benefits; and
- Annual income for 2010 is between $24,432 and $34,432 if you are single or between $29,956 and $39,956 if you are married.
The bill was approved 78-0 by the Assembly in October and 39-0 by the Senate in June. It now goes to the Governor.
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Dispelling Rumors, Exposing Truth
Reading Plainfield Today’s blog, I find it very interesting that Dan tries to tie me to an issue that I do not know anything about, in terms of the Council President’s concern about not getting information on time. As I will continue to speak out in the future on any issues that do not involve me directly, I was not part nor had any input on the WBLS broadcasting. So for Dan to try to tie me into this particular issue, I find it very insulting.
I was hoping that as we moved on into the future, my job would be to get people elected, as Party Chairman, and also represent those in the 22nd Legislative District as your Assemblyman. Rather than devoting my attention to local issues, I feel it is more important spending my time working in Trenton on behalf of Plainfield and the 22nd District. I like to feel I have done a good job as their representative.
Dan I feel I have been very fair, and whenever I mention you in my blogs, I try to give you the benefit of the doubt. But it is obvious that you are not happy when someone tries to give you respect. I find it very interesting that these charges you were charged with as of late, regarding you approaching a young man, making him feel uncomfortable as a man, are pending. And another complaint was filed by another young man, who you made feel very uncomfortable while using the restroom at one of our local stores.
You were fortunate enough twenty years ago for these types of charges to be dropped. But it is obvious that this last young man, who feels he has had enough of feeling uncomfortable whenever he is in your presence, has decided to pursue this matter in court. My understanding is that in the latter part of last month you pleaded innocent to these charges.
So it would seem that you would try and spend more time doing damage control with the embarrassment you have brought to the New Democrats, trying to correct a matter that is not a lie: you did go to court, you have pleaded innocent, so like any other person, you deserve your day in court. But you would rather drag the New Democrats and the City of Plainfield through the court system, wasting our taxpayer dollars, rather than accept the fact that whether it is true or not, you would feel as a person, that it is time to stop trying to use your ability as a writer to destroy other people, including myself.
I do not use the bathroom to watch other men, so I am very comfortable with that fact that I do not intimidate other men. Again, I am not accusing you of being innocent or guilty, but as you wrote in your blog, “…there were widespread rumors about Assemblyman Green putting pressure on the BOE to hire an attorney…,” which is not true.
Again, you use the word rumors. When you went to court and pleaded not guilty, that was not a rumor. So there is a big difference between a rumor and truth. You’re being charged with making another man feel uncomfortable while using the bathroom is not a rumor. This man has pressed charges and you have pled not guilty. So I will give you the benefit of the doubt, and you will have your day in court, wherein the judge will determine your innocence and guilt. You have used ‘rumors’, ‘rumors on the street’ to cast shadows on people. It is time you stop.
If you want to play the rumor game, let’s start now, because you cannot win. I am hoping you are found innocent because there are a lot of good people, especially within the New Democrat camp, that do not deserve this embarrassment.
Ps
For those who read my blogs across the State, unfortunately sometimes, locally speaking, there are some bloggers who spend all their time acting like a tabloid, rather than giving the public important information. Unfortunately, tabloids have an audience, and that audience has to also be feed the truth at some time.
So this is the only reason why I waste my time on them. I understand tabloids normally print what they consider the truth. They don’t print it as a rumor. A rumor can sometimes be just as dangerous as a lie. This is why I have to sometimes respond and lay the facts out, so that my readers do not become misled; especially by an individual who has been charged and entered a not guilty plea. I hope he is innocent and not have to go to jail, because it would not be healthy for him to be there.
I am not accusing him of being guilty and I am hoping that he is in fact, not guilty.
Dan, maybe I can recommend an attorney for you. Her name is Joan Van Pelt, an attorney here in Plainfield. She sat back while her young client pled guilty and spent twenty years in prison for a crime he did not commit. He was found innocent after spending twenty years in prison.
I was hoping that as we moved on into the future, my job would be to get people elected, as Party Chairman, and also represent those in the 22nd Legislative District as your Assemblyman. Rather than devoting my attention to local issues, I feel it is more important spending my time working in Trenton on behalf of Plainfield and the 22nd District. I like to feel I have done a good job as their representative.
Dan I feel I have been very fair, and whenever I mention you in my blogs, I try to give you the benefit of the doubt. But it is obvious that you are not happy when someone tries to give you respect. I find it very interesting that these charges you were charged with as of late, regarding you approaching a young man, making him feel uncomfortable as a man, are pending. And another complaint was filed by another young man, who you made feel very uncomfortable while using the restroom at one of our local stores.
You were fortunate enough twenty years ago for these types of charges to be dropped. But it is obvious that this last young man, who feels he has had enough of feeling uncomfortable whenever he is in your presence, has decided to pursue this matter in court. My understanding is that in the latter part of last month you pleaded innocent to these charges.
So it would seem that you would try and spend more time doing damage control with the embarrassment you have brought to the New Democrats, trying to correct a matter that is not a lie: you did go to court, you have pleaded innocent, so like any other person, you deserve your day in court. But you would rather drag the New Democrats and the City of Plainfield through the court system, wasting our taxpayer dollars, rather than accept the fact that whether it is true or not, you would feel as a person, that it is time to stop trying to use your ability as a writer to destroy other people, including myself.
I do not use the bathroom to watch other men, so I am very comfortable with that fact that I do not intimidate other men. Again, I am not accusing you of being innocent or guilty, but as you wrote in your blog, “…there were widespread rumors about Assemblyman Green putting pressure on the BOE to hire an attorney…,” which is not true.
Again, you use the word rumors. When you went to court and pleaded not guilty, that was not a rumor. So there is a big difference between a rumor and truth. You’re being charged with making another man feel uncomfortable while using the bathroom is not a rumor. This man has pressed charges and you have pled not guilty. So I will give you the benefit of the doubt, and you will have your day in court, wherein the judge will determine your innocence and guilt. You have used ‘rumors’, ‘rumors on the street’ to cast shadows on people. It is time you stop.
If you want to play the rumor game, let’s start now, because you cannot win. I am hoping you are found innocent because there are a lot of good people, especially within the New Democrat camp, that do not deserve this embarrassment.
Ps
For those who read my blogs across the State, unfortunately sometimes, locally speaking, there are some bloggers who spend all their time acting like a tabloid, rather than giving the public important information. Unfortunately, tabloids have an audience, and that audience has to also be feed the truth at some time.
So this is the only reason why I waste my time on them. I understand tabloids normally print what they consider the truth. They don’t print it as a rumor. A rumor can sometimes be just as dangerous as a lie. This is why I have to sometimes respond and lay the facts out, so that my readers do not become misled; especially by an individual who has been charged and entered a not guilty plea. I hope he is innocent and not have to go to jail, because it would not be healthy for him to be there.
I am not accusing him of being guilty and I am hoping that he is in fact, not guilty.
Dan, maybe I can recommend an attorney for you. Her name is Joan Van Pelt, an attorney here in Plainfield. She sat back while her young client pled guilty and spent twenty years in prison for a crime he did not commit. He was found innocent after spending twenty years in prison.
Assembly Advances Quijano Bill to Ensure Equal Opportunities for Women & Minority Businesses
(Trenton) - A measure sponsored by Assemblywoman Annette Quijano and designed to ensure that women- and minority owned businesses in New Jersey have access to the same opportunities as other businesses was recently approved by the General Assembly.
"This bill is intended to ensure that the opportunities guaranteed by federal and state law are available equally to minority-owned and women-owned businesses in New Jersey," said Quijano (D-Union). "This will help ensure that all those who are deserving have access to the same economic opportunities afforded by the state, not just the politically connected."
The bill (A-3741), approved by a vote of 46-32, would establish a Division of Minority and Women Business Development, to be headed by a State Chief Disparity Officer within the Department of Treasury. The division would administer and monitor policies, practices and programs that further the state's efforts to ensure equal opportunity for minority-owned and women-owned business enterprises when it comes to purchasing and procurement by state departments and agencies, including independent state authorities.
The State Chief Disparity Officer would monitor the state's public contracting process for the purpose of compiling information on the awarding of contracts to minority-owned and women-owned business enterprises, including the total value of all contracts and the percentage of the value of those contracts awarded to minority-owned and women-owned business enterprises.
"By regularly compiling hard data concerning the number of women and minority businesses contracting for projects in New Jersey, we will be better positioned to verify that these businesses are adequately represented in state contracting. The availability of this type of information also plays in integral part in judicial scrutiny of affirmative action measures," added Quijano.
The bill would also direct each state department and agency, including independent state authorities, to designate a disparity officer to act as a liaison with the State Chief Disparity Officer. The officer would periodically report their findings to the Governor and the Legislature.
The measure is based in part on legislation recently enacted in New York State, and codifies into law the creation of the Division of Minority and Women Business Development, which was enacted by executive order in 2006.
The bill now heads to the Senate for consideration.
"This bill is intended to ensure that the opportunities guaranteed by federal and state law are available equally to minority-owned and women-owned businesses in New Jersey," said Quijano (D-Union). "This will help ensure that all those who are deserving have access to the same economic opportunities afforded by the state, not just the politically connected."
The bill (A-3741), approved by a vote of 46-32, would establish a Division of Minority and Women Business Development, to be headed by a State Chief Disparity Officer within the Department of Treasury. The division would administer and monitor policies, practices and programs that further the state's efforts to ensure equal opportunity for minority-owned and women-owned business enterprises when it comes to purchasing and procurement by state departments and agencies, including independent state authorities.
The State Chief Disparity Officer would monitor the state's public contracting process for the purpose of compiling information on the awarding of contracts to minority-owned and women-owned business enterprises, including the total value of all contracts and the percentage of the value of those contracts awarded to minority-owned and women-owned business enterprises.
"By regularly compiling hard data concerning the number of women and minority businesses contracting for projects in New Jersey, we will be better positioned to verify that these businesses are adequately represented in state contracting. The availability of this type of information also plays in integral part in judicial scrutiny of affirmative action measures," added Quijano.
The bill would also direct each state department and agency, including independent state authorities, to designate a disparity officer to act as a liaison with the State Chief Disparity Officer. The officer would periodically report their findings to the Governor and the Legislature.
The measure is based in part on legislation recently enacted in New York State, and codifies into law the creation of the Division of Minority and Women Business Development, which was enacted by executive order in 2006.
The bill now heads to the Senate for consideration.
Education Law Center News
Governor Blocks Fair School Funding For All Districts
Governor Chris Christie's line-item veto of the FY 2012 State Budget approved by the Legislature brought an abrupt halt to the grassroots effort to restore the Governor's massive $1.6 billion cut in school aid in 2010-11, and bring all districts to the funding level set by the School Funding Reform Act (SFRA), the State's school aid formula.
Governor Chris Christie's line-item veto of the FY 2012 State Budget approved by the Legislature brought an abrupt halt to the grassroots effort to restore the Governor's massive $1.6 billion cut in school aid in 2010-11, and bring all districts to the funding level set by the School Funding Reform Act (SFRA), the State's school aid formula.
The Governor's veto falls hardest on 221 mostly moderate- and middle-income districts with school budgets below the level set by the SFRA as necessary to deliver the NJ Core Curriculum Content Standards (CCCS) to all students, especially low-income (at-risk) students, English language learners (ELL), and students with disabilities.
"The Governor's veto is deeply disappointing because it deprives thousands of students in every county the resources they need to achieve rigorous academic standards and graduate college- and workforce-ready," said David G. Sciarra, Executive Director of the Education Law Center.
The final FY12 State Budget does, however, provide full SFRA formula funding for 31 of NJ's poorest urban communities, as mandated by the NJ Supreme Court's May 24 ruling (Abbott XXI) in the landmark Abbott v. Burke education equity case. The FY12 Budget also adds funding for other districts.
While district specific breakdowns have yet to be released, below are the estimated aid increases for the coming school year:
- $500 million in K-12 and preschool aid for the 31 poor, urban districts, bringing these districts to full formula funding under the SFRA;
- $334 million in K-12 aid to other urban, rural and suburban districts, presenting a 2% boost over the 2009-10 state aid level.
However, the Governor's veto left many critical public education needs under-funded or not funded at all. These include:
- Well over $500 million in K-12 school aid to bring all remaining districts to full funding under the SFRA formula.
- Funding for the expansion of the nationally recognized Abbott preschool program to 80 additional high-need communities, and to all low-income children in the remaining districts, as required by the SFRA.
- Elimination of funding for NJ After 3, which provides extended learning time to at-risk children across the state.
- A $13.2 million cut in before- and afterschool "wraparound" care, a program critical to the success of childcare providers participating in the Abbott preschool program.
With the FY12 education budget mostly settled, New Jersey's equity advocates are beginning to turn their attention to the FY13 budget process. The most critical task will be to keep the SFRA formula fully intact as the mechanism to determine the cost and funding levels for public education in New Jersey. The SFRA, adopted with bi-partisan support in 2008, and approved by the Supreme Court in 2009, is considered a model for the delivery of funding for rigorous, standards-based education for all students, especially those at-risk, regardless of zip code.
Advocates will be looking to secure funds in the FY13 State Budget to move all remaining districts to full SFRA funding, to begin the long overdue expansion of high quality preschool across New Jersey, and to restore the devastating cuts to afterschool and wraparound programs.
"The FY12 Budget makes some progress toward delivering fair and adequate funding to all of our 1.3 million public school students, but we still have a way to go," said Mr. Sciarra. "The hard work of finishing off the job left by the Governor's unfortunate veto begins now."
Monday, July 11, 2011
Wisniewski to Introduce Bill to Assist Law Enforcement in Finding Missing Children, Bring Justice to Victims
(Trenton) - Assemblyman John Wisniewski (D-Middlesex) today announced he will introduce a bill designed to assist law enforcement in the search for abducted children, and increase the chances of determining cause of death in death investigations, in light of the circumstances that played out before the whole county in the trial of Casey Anthony.
The bill would make failing to report a death in New Jersey a felony, and require that a missing child be reported to police within 24 hours. Under current law, failing to report a death is a disorderly person offense, and there is no set timeframe for a child reported missing.
"The entire country has mourned the loss of Caylee Anthony, whose little body laid in the woods for months before police were notified she was missing. Had they been notified sooner, they could have determined the cause of her death and justice may have been served for this little girl," said Wisniewski. "We know the first hours are crucial in finding a missing child. Prompt notification would help police with their search, and in the awful case that tragedy strikes, would help them determine the cause of death, get a guilty conviction and bring justice to the victim."
The bill would amend current law (N.J.S.A. 52:17B-89) by making it a crime for anyone who becomes aware of a death by criminal violence or accident and fails to report that death to the county medical examiner, the State Medical Examiner, or the municipal police department where the death occurred.
Under current law, a person who "willfully neglects or refuses" to report the death, or who touches, removes, or disturbs the body of a dead person, is guilty of a disorderly persons offense, which is punishable by up to six months in prison, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. The law requires the prosecution prove the person was aware of the death, and provide proof that the person willfully neglected or refused to report the death.
Wisniewski wants this disorderly persons offense to be elevated to a felony.
The bill would also establish a 24 hour timeframe for reporting a child missing.
Wisniewski noted that it is generally recognized by law enforcement that, at least in the case of abducted children, notification of a missing child should be made as soon as possible, since the immediate hours after abduction are the most crucial in finding a child, but there is currently no set timeframe. Under the statutes governing the State Police Missing Persons Unit, a missing child is defined as "a person 13 years of age or younger whose whereabouts are not currently known."
"The sooner the police know a child is missing, the greater the chance the child will be found. We have mourned the loss of too many children who were snatched from their families never to be seen again, or worse, have perished at the hands of their abductors," said Wisniewski. "This timeframe gives our law enforcement officials the time needed to do their jobs effectively, and children who have been abducted the hope that they will be found safe."
The bill would make failing to report a death in New Jersey a felony, and require that a missing child be reported to police within 24 hours. Under current law, failing to report a death is a disorderly person offense, and there is no set timeframe for a child reported missing.
"The entire country has mourned the loss of Caylee Anthony, whose little body laid in the woods for months before police were notified she was missing. Had they been notified sooner, they could have determined the cause of her death and justice may have been served for this little girl," said Wisniewski. "We know the first hours are crucial in finding a missing child. Prompt notification would help police with their search, and in the awful case that tragedy strikes, would help them determine the cause of death, get a guilty conviction and bring justice to the victim."
The bill would amend current law (N.J.S.A. 52:17B-89) by making it a crime for anyone who becomes aware of a death by criminal violence or accident and fails to report that death to the county medical examiner, the State Medical Examiner, or the municipal police department where the death occurred.
Under current law, a person who "willfully neglects or refuses" to report the death, or who touches, removes, or disturbs the body of a dead person, is guilty of a disorderly persons offense, which is punishable by up to six months in prison, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. The law requires the prosecution prove the person was aware of the death, and provide proof that the person willfully neglected or refused to report the death.
Wisniewski wants this disorderly persons offense to be elevated to a felony.
The bill would also establish a 24 hour timeframe for reporting a child missing.
Wisniewski noted that it is generally recognized by law enforcement that, at least in the case of abducted children, notification of a missing child should be made as soon as possible, since the immediate hours after abduction are the most crucial in finding a child, but there is currently no set timeframe. Under the statutes governing the State Police Missing Persons Unit, a missing child is defined as "a person 13 years of age or younger whose whereabouts are not currently known."
"The sooner the police know a child is missing, the greater the chance the child will be found. We have mourned the loss of too many children who were snatched from their families never to be seen again, or worse, have perished at the hands of their abductors," said Wisniewski. "This timeframe gives our law enforcement officials the time needed to do their jobs effectively, and children who have been abducted the hope that they will be found safe."
Watson Coleman to Introduce Bill Requiring NJTV to Show Lottery Drawings
The bill would return live lottery drawings, which are currently only available online, to TV sets in New Jersey
(Trenton) - Assemblywoman Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-Mercer) today announced she will introduce a bill that would return live New Jersey Lottery drawings to television.
The bill would require NJTV, the station that replaced NJN earlier this month, to televise lottery drawings for free. The New Jersey Lottery debuted a new live Internet version of the daily drawings after the state changed from the state-run NJN to the privately operated NJTV.
Drawings are now only available online on the lottery's website and its Facebook page.
"Not everybody owns or has access to a computer, so limiting live drawings to the Internet would leave many residents who play the lottery in the dark," said Watson Coleman. "Rather than alienate people who actively play and contribute to the New Jersey Lottery, this bill would continue the tradition of televised drawings in New Jersey's new TV station. NJTV said it was committed to providing New Jersey content. This is a perfect opportunity for them to do just that, and show New Jersey residents they are indeed committed to showing the news and entertainment content residents grew accustomed to with our previous TV station."
According to media reports, the reason for the switch from televised to online lottery drawings was financial. Lottery officials chose not to renew the contract with NJN months before a contract was signed with the New York based WNET to operate NJTV to save money, according to media reports.
(Trenton) - Assemblywoman Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-Mercer) today announced she will introduce a bill that would return live New Jersey Lottery drawings to television.
The bill would require NJTV, the station that replaced NJN earlier this month, to televise lottery drawings for free. The New Jersey Lottery debuted a new live Internet version of the daily drawings after the state changed from the state-run NJN to the privately operated NJTV.
Drawings are now only available online on the lottery's website and its Facebook page.
"Not everybody owns or has access to a computer, so limiting live drawings to the Internet would leave many residents who play the lottery in the dark," said Watson Coleman. "Rather than alienate people who actively play and contribute to the New Jersey Lottery, this bill would continue the tradition of televised drawings in New Jersey's new TV station. NJTV said it was committed to providing New Jersey content. This is a perfect opportunity for them to do just that, and show New Jersey residents they are indeed committed to showing the news and entertainment content residents grew accustomed to with our previous TV station."
According to media reports, the reason for the switch from televised to online lottery drawings was financial. Lottery officials chose not to renew the contract with NJN months before a contract was signed with the New York based WNET to operate NJTV to save money, according to media reports.
Oliver & Giblin: Extensive School Aid Cuts Show Governor's Disregard for Education, Taxpayers
Under the governor's budget, school districts in Essex and Passaic saw their school aid slashed by $34.6 million
(Trenton) - Assembly Speaker Sheila Y. Oliver (D-Essex/Passaic) and Assemblyman Thomas P. Giblin (D-Essex/Passaic) released the following statement on Gov. Christie's line-item vetoes that will cost 34th Legislative District taxpayers $34.6 million in school aid:
"The governor had the option to responsibly and adequately fund public education, but instead chose to shortchange school districts in the 34th district and around the state," said Oliver. "It's unfortunate that the governor again decided to protect tax cuts for millionaires over school aid and property tax relief for working class families."
School districts in the 34th district would have received $318 million in school aid under the budget passed by the Legislature. The school aid allocation would have been funding by the Millionaire's Tax bill, which imposed a new levy on the 16,000 New Jerseyans that earn $1 million or more per year. The bill passed the Legislature, but was vetoed by the governor.
Clifton was hit the hardest with the $14 million lost in school aid. Essex County Voc-Tech suffered a decrease of $7 million, and Montclair a decrease in $2 million.
"The budget passed by the Legislature fairly balanced the needs of school districts with the need for property tax relief for working class taxpayers. Seems that was a little too fair for the governor," said Giblin. "He cut $34.6 million from school districts in the 34th district, even more from others, but had no qualms about allowing tax breaks for millionaires. The governor has never made it a secret where his allegiance lies, but this is reprehensible."
(Trenton) - Assembly Speaker Sheila Y. Oliver (D-Essex/Passaic) and Assemblyman Thomas P. Giblin (D-Essex/Passaic) released the following statement on Gov. Christie's line-item vetoes that will cost 34th Legislative District taxpayers $34.6 million in school aid:
"The governor had the option to responsibly and adequately fund public education, but instead chose to shortchange school districts in the 34th district and around the state," said Oliver. "It's unfortunate that the governor again decided to protect tax cuts for millionaires over school aid and property tax relief for working class families."
School districts in the 34th district would have received $318 million in school aid under the budget passed by the Legislature. The school aid allocation would have been funding by the Millionaire's Tax bill, which imposed a new levy on the 16,000 New Jerseyans that earn $1 million or more per year. The bill passed the Legislature, but was vetoed by the governor.
Clifton was hit the hardest with the $14 million lost in school aid. Essex County Voc-Tech suffered a decrease of $7 million, and Montclair a decrease in $2 million.
"The budget passed by the Legislature fairly balanced the needs of school districts with the need for property tax relief for working class taxpayers. Seems that was a little too fair for the governor," said Giblin. "He cut $34.6 million from school districts in the 34th district, even more from others, but had no qualms about allowing tax breaks for millionaires. The governor has never made it a secret where his allegiance lies, but this is reprehensible."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)